1976
DOI: 10.1038/262460a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil hominids from the Laetolil Beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas their pattern of locomotion is likely to have included some arboreality, they were fully bipedal and did show many signs of advanced bipedal bone structure. The 3.5 million-year-old Laetoli footprints of Australopithecus afarensis show human-like proportions, arches, heel strike, and convergent big toes (40). Comparative anatomical analysis of human, apes, and fossil hominids indicate that A. afarensis had significant features of bipedality (39,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas their pattern of locomotion is likely to have included some arboreality, they were fully bipedal and did show many signs of advanced bipedal bone structure. The 3.5 million-year-old Laetoli footprints of Australopithecus afarensis show human-like proportions, arches, heel strike, and convergent big toes (40). Comparative anatomical analysis of human, apes, and fossil hominids indicate that A. afarensis had significant features of bipedality (39,41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17). This was one of the features that led to the preliminary attribution of the Laetoli and part of the Hadar hominid collections to the early part of the Homo lineage (Leakey et al, 1976;Johanson and Taieb, 19761, and in Finally, we are not at all certain that the anteriorly and superiorly placed inferior transverse torus cited by Wolpoff is a genuine synapomorphy because this structure is rudimentary in H. habilis, whereas in A. africanus and "robust" Australopithecus species it is usually well developed.…”
Section: Africanus)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Subsequent to this, A. anamensis, a species more derived than A. ramidus and probably transitional to A. afarensis, has been reported from the 3.9-4.2 myr interval (Leakey et al, 1995). A. afarensis becomes widespread by circa 3.5 myr, as represented by the Ethiopian and Tanzanian fossil record (Leakey et al, 1976;Johanson and White, 1979;White et al, 1993). Kimbel et al (1994) reported A. afarensis to have existed a t Hadar at circa 2.95 myr, exhibiting no detectable morphological difference from the circa 3.4 myr condition.…”
Section: The Early Recordmentioning
confidence: 96%