1979
DOI: 10.2172/5918880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossil energy program. Progress report, March 1979

Abstract: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, nor assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed in this report, nor represents that its use by such third party would n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SRC-I and SRC-II -In terms of environmental assessment activity, both SRC projects are at the same point. For both the SRC projects the month was spent: (1) developing art overall environmental plan fur DOE~ ORO specifying all environmental steps required to fulfill the NEPA (EIS) requirements, and to fulfill environmental permitting and licensing requirements; (2) developing detailed site-and process-specific EIS outlines, including the site and process alternatives; (3) collecting information for the EIS analyses such as site selection studies for each project; (4) preparing Npti~es• of Inierit to p~epare an EIS for each project for publication by DOE-HQ in the• •Federal Register; (5) preparing for the Public Scoping,Meetings to be held•shortly for the purpose of soliciting the public's environmental concerns; (6) Development• of the XRF method of analysis is continuing. This•ruethod is expected• td provide the capability• to run an increased number of samples and g•ain statistical significance.…”
Section: Liquefaction Projects -S G Deciccomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRC-I and SRC-II -In terms of environmental assessment activity, both SRC projects are at the same point. For both the SRC projects the month was spent: (1) developing art overall environmental plan fur DOE~ ORO specifying all environmental steps required to fulfill the NEPA (EIS) requirements, and to fulfill environmental permitting and licensing requirements; (2) developing detailed site-and process-specific EIS outlines, including the site and process alternatives; (3) collecting information for the EIS analyses such as site selection studies for each project; (4) preparing Npti~es• of Inierit to p~epare an EIS for each project for publication by DOE-HQ in the• •Federal Register; (5) preparing for the Public Scoping,Meetings to be held•shortly for the purpose of soliciting the public's environmental concerns; (6) Development• of the XRF method of analysis is continuing. This•ruethod is expected• td provide the capability• to run an increased number of samples and g•ain statistical significance.…”
Section: Liquefaction Projects -S G Deciccomentioning
confidence: 99%