2015 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icac.2015.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fossa: Learning ECA Rules for Adaptive Distributed Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An adaptation rule consists of three parts, similarly to the Event-Condition-Action structure of ECA rules [48]:…”
Section: Adaptation Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adaptation rule consists of three parts, similarly to the Event-Condition-Action structure of ECA rules [48]:…”
Section: Adaptation Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagram shows that in a substantial number of papers (34 in total), learning supports both analysis and planning. An example is described in [32], where machine learning is applied to generate Event-Condition-Action rules that are evaluated and subsequently used to make adaptation decisions. A smaller fraction of the papers (6 in total) combine learning to support monitoring and analysis.…”
Section: Mape Functions Supported By Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagram shows that in a substantial number of papers (34 in total), learning supports both analysis and planning. An example is described in Reference [33], where machine learning is applied to generate Event-Condition-Action rules that are evaluated and subsequently used to make adaptation decisions. A smaller fraction of the papers (six in total) combine learning to support monitoring and analysis.…”
Section: Rq2: What Are the Key Engineering Aspects Considered When Applying Learning In Self-adaptation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to mitigate this threat, we excluded all short papers and papers that do not provide a minimum level of assessment. For instance, we excluded Reference [33], although the topic is relevant for our study, but this is a short paper. Similarly, we excluded Reference [81], since this regular paper does not provide a sufficient level of assessment.…”
Section: Threats To Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%