1996
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00763-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fos immunoreactivity in the rat brain following consummatory elements of sexual behavior: a sex comparison

Abstract: Please be advised that this information was generated on 2018-05-12 and may be subject to change. BRAIN RESEARCH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
128
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
16
128
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed in rats, with continuously increasing activity during mating, until after EJAC, when activity decreased during the postejaculatory interval (PEI) (Shimura et al, 1994). Similarly, sexual activity increased Fos immunoreactivity (-ir), a measure of cellular activity, in the MPOA of male rats (Baum and Everitt, 1992;Bressler and Baum, 1996;Coolen et al, 1996; for review, see Pfaus and Heeb, 1997), hamsters (Kollack-Walker and Newman, 1997), gerbils (Heeb and Yahr, 1996), and musk shrews (Gill et al, 1998). These data support the conclusion that neural activity in the MPOA is important for male sexual behavior.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similar results were observed in rats, with continuously increasing activity during mating, until after EJAC, when activity decreased during the postejaculatory interval (PEI) (Shimura et al, 1994). Similarly, sexual activity increased Fos immunoreactivity (-ir), a measure of cellular activity, in the MPOA of male rats (Baum and Everitt, 1992;Bressler and Baum, 1996;Coolen et al, 1996; for review, see Pfaus and Heeb, 1997), hamsters (Kollack-Walker and Newman, 1997), gerbils (Heeb and Yahr, 1996), and musk shrews (Gill et al, 1998). These data support the conclusion that neural activity in the MPOA is important for male sexual behavior.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Noncontact erections and exposure to the bedding of an estrous female also induced Fos-ir in the MPOA of male rats, but the effects were less dramatic than those observed following copulation [48]. In one subregion, the posterodorsal preoptic nucleus, Fos-ir was significantly increased only following ejaculation in male rats [49], hamsters [46] and gerbils [47], again suggesting that subregions within the MPOA may play different roles in regulating copulation.…”
Section: Measuring Mating-induced Activity In the Mpoamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, a large number of studies in a variety of species indicate that stereotaxic implants of testosterone in the mPOA activate most if not all aspects of male copulatory behavior [32,80]. The implication of the mPOA in the control of male sexual behavior is also attested by experiments demonstrating that performance of this behavior increases neuronal activity in this brain region as assessed by an increase in 2-deoxyglucose incorporation [60], cytochrome oxidase activity [122] or increased transcription of immediate early genes such as c-fos or egr-1 (also know as Zenk in the avian literature) [49,56,76,93,118,134,153].…”
Section: The Preoptic Area As An Integration Center For the Control Omentioning
confidence: 95%