2007
DOI: 10.5194/hess-11-1661-2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward Modeling and validation of a new formulation to compute self-potential signals associated with ground water flow

Abstract: Abstract. The classical formulation of the coupled hydroelectrical flow in porous media is based on a linear formulation of two coupled constitutive equations for the electrical current density and the seepage velocity of the water phase and obeying Onsager's reciprocity. This formulation shows that the streaming current density is controlled by the gradient of the fluid pressure of the water phase and a streaming current coupling coefficient that depends on the so-called zeta potential. Recently a new formula… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have been published during the two last decades about the use of the SP method for hydrological purposes (see for instance the reviews by Bolève et al, 2007;Jouniaux et al, 2009;Revil et al, 2012 and references therein). In particular, the SP method gave excellent results when applied to pumping tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been published during the two last decades about the use of the SP method for hydrological purposes (see for instance the reviews by Bolève et al, 2007;Jouniaux et al, 2009;Revil et al, 2012 and references therein). In particular, the SP method gave excellent results when applied to pumping tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wurmstich and Morgan [8] used a 3-D finite-difference algorithm to simulate streaming potential responses during oil pumping with the aim of using streaming potential as a tool to monitor subsurface flow. Other similar and relevant studies can also be found in [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and references therein. These researches, however, usually neglect the effect of electrical potential on fluid flow and instead are focused on the characteristics of electrical potential distribution because the authors argue that the electrical potential have only negligible influences on fluid flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The electric current density can also been expressed as a function of the volumetric charge density Q V and the Darcy velocity v. The volumetric charge density is sometimes expressed as a function of permeability, but this formula has not been validated using independent measurements of permeability and charge density deduced from the cation exchange capacity (CEC) measurements. Usually the volumetric charge density is deduced from streaming potential coefficient measurements using the following formula (Bolève et al, 2007):…”
Section: Role Of Key Parameters On the Steady-state Electrokinetic Comentioning
confidence: 99%