2006
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2005.860986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward model and Jacobians for Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer retrievals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TES retrievals of trace gas profiles are based on an optimal estimation approach (with a priori constraints) that minimizes the differences between the TES Level 1B spectra and a radiative transfer calculation that uses absorption coefficients calculated with the line-by-line radiative transfer model LBLRTM [20,[42][43][44][45]. Current Level 2 products from TES (V004) include retrieved profiles of CO, O 3 , H 2 O, HDO, and CH 4 .…”
Section: Tes Special Observations During Arctas-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TES retrievals of trace gas profiles are based on an optimal estimation approach (with a priori constraints) that minimizes the differences between the TES Level 1B spectra and a radiative transfer calculation that uses absorption coefficients calculated with the line-by-line radiative transfer model LBLRTM [20,[42][43][44][45]. Current Level 2 products from TES (V004) include retrieved profiles of CO, O 3 , H 2 O, HDO, and CH 4 .…”
Section: Tes Special Observations During Arctas-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lot of effort devoted to the development of fast radiative transfer models (RTMs) for simulating radiances observed by these hyperspectral instruments (McMillin et al, 1995(McMillin et al, , 1997Armbruster and Fischer, 1996;Tjemkes and Schmetz, 1997;Matricardi and Saunders, 1999;Edwards and Francis, 2000;Saunders et al, 1999;Liu et al, 2003;Matricardi, 2003;Moncet et al, 2004;Strow et al, 2003Strow et al, , 2006Clough et al, 2006). These models are much faster than line-by-line (LBL) RTMs, but it is still challenging to incorporate thousands of channel radiances into data assimilation systems or variational retrieval systems due to computational limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCRTM fast forward model was trained with v8.3 of the LBLRTM, while the OSS fast forward model was trained with v6.01 of the LBLRTM. In v8.3, the chi line-shape factor and the continuum for CO 2 optical depth calculations have been modified in the 500 cm −1 to 900 cm −1 regions, resulting in an overall increase in CO 2 absorption (Clough et al, 2006). In version 6.01 of the LBLRTM, the CKD 2.4.1 water continuum model was used while the version 8.3 uses the MT CKD 1.0 continuum model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TES forward model is described in Clough et al (2006). Calculations of radiances and Jacobians are performed using a fixed pressure grid of 66 levels.…”
Section: Retrieval Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%