2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0215-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward Masking Estimated by Signal Detection Theory Analysis of Neuronal Responses in Primary Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Psychophysical forward masking is an increase in threshold of detection of a sound (probe) when it is preceded by another sound (masker). This is reminiscent of the reduction in neuronal responses to a sound following prior stimulation. Studies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus using signal detection theory techniques to derive neuronal thresholds showed that in centrally projecting neurons, increases in masked thresholds were significantly smaller than the changes measured psychophysically. Larger th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of SC, across-cell correlation has been noted to reduce the effectiveness of pooling (Alves-Pinto et al 2010;Zohary et al 1994; for a counterexample, see Romo et al 2003). Since our pooling methods (except in the case of the multiunit considered as a pool) combine trials that were collected at different times, any correlation in SC that might have been present in an in vivo pooling operation will be missing in our simulation, and our SC threshold estimates may be too low (i.e., too sensitive) to the extent that we have failed to capture existing correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the case of SC, across-cell correlation has been noted to reduce the effectiveness of pooling (Alves-Pinto et al 2010;Zohary et al 1994; for a counterexample, see Romo et al 2003). Since our pooling methods (except in the case of the multiunit considered as a pool) combine trials that were collected at different times, any correlation in SC that might have been present in an in vivo pooling operation will be missing in our simulation, and our SC threshold estimates may be too low (i.e., too sensitive) to the extent that we have failed to capture existing correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the large variability in forward masking in their dataset makes difficult to reconcile their neuronal threshold shifts with psychophysical threshold shifts. Alves-Pinto et al (2010) explored the magnitude of forward masking by recording from neurons on the auditory cortex of anesthetized guinea pigs. They found that threshold shifts were larger in the cortex compared to those observed in subcortical areas, suggesting that cortical processes might be involved in forward masking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter observation suggests that slow adaptation to temporal coherence across-frequency is necessary to implement this form of CMR. The nature of such adaptation is not known but could include cortical synaptic depression (Carandini et al, 2002; Chung et al, 2002; Freeman et al, 2002), forward suppression (Wehr and Zador, 2005; Alves-Pinto et al, 2010; Scholes et al, 2011), and/or modulation at subcortical processing stations via cortical feedback (Bajo et al, 2007; Malmierca and Ryugo, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%