2022
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2022-73
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forward and inverse modeling of water flow in unsaturated soils with discontinuous hydraulic conductivities using physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition

Abstract: Abstract. Modeling water flow in unsaturated soils is vital for describing various hydrological and ecological phenomena. Soil water dynamics is described by well-established physical laws (Richardson-Richards equation (RRE)). Solving the RRE is difficult due to the inherent non-linearity of the processes, and various numerical methods have been proposed to solve the issue. However, applying the methods to practical situations is very challenging because they require well-defined initial and boundary condition… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our preliminary tests gave positive results on the extension of PINNs to saturated-unsaturated cases. Readers may refer to the author comment in the interactive public discussion (Bandai and Ghezzehei, 2022a).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our preliminary tests gave positive results on the extension of PINNs to saturated-unsaturated cases. Readers may refer to the author comment in the interactive public discussion (Bandai and Ghezzehei, 2022a).…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PINN is particularly promising for ill-posed forward and inverse problems, while traditional numerical methods, such as finite element methods [21] and finite difference methods [22], require well-defined initial and boundary conditions, which is unavailable in most applications. However, PINN is much slower than traditional numerical methods [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%