2007
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fortuitous detection of a submicroscopic deletion at 1q25 in a girl with Cornelia‐de Lange syndrome carrying t(5;13)(p13.1;q12.1) by array‐based comparative genomic hybridization

Abstract: We report on a 2-year-old Japanese girl with Cornelia-de Lange syndrome (CdLS) who had mental and growth retardation, together with characteristic facial anomalies and mild extremity malformations. She had a balanced chromosomal translocation, 46,XX,t(5;13)(p13.1;q12.1) de novo. Surprisingly, this was the same translocation that had provided a clue to the identification of a major causative gene for CdLS, NIPBL [Krantz et al., 2004; Tonkin et al., 2004]. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the bre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, this study represents the first systematic array‐CGH analyses of patients with CdLS‐like features, previously screened for mutations in the two major causative genes. It expands the studies by Borck et al (10), Schoumans et al (18) and Hayashi et al (17) altogether reporting on 4 of 19 patients found by array‐CGH to carry genomic imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, this study represents the first systematic array‐CGH analyses of patients with CdLS‐like features, previously screened for mutations in the two major causative genes. It expands the studies by Borck et al (10), Schoumans et al (18) and Hayashi et al (17) altogether reporting on 4 of 19 patients found by array‐CGH to carry genomic imbalances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Till now only a few studies have applied array‐CGH to a restricted number of CdLS patients. These studies have identified de novo rearrangements including a submicroscopic deletion of terminal chromosome 1q (10), a serendipitous additional submicroscopic deletion at 1q25‐q31.1 in a girl with the causative (i.e., NIPBL targeting) t(5;13)(p13.1;q12.1) translocation (17) and a 9p24.3 (telomeric) duplication of 0.6 Mb (18). To investigate chromosomal rearrangements pointing to additional positional candidate CdLS genes, we analyzed by array‐CGH a subgroup of 24 CdLS patients negative for NIPBL and SMC1L1 mutations.…”
Section: Dna Copy Number Alterations Found In Patients 4 32 and 51mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these observations have important implications for the establishment of genotypephenotype correlations because they imply that the contribution of novel unbalanced regions independent of the breakpoints needs to be considered. For example, Hayashi et al 30 described a 1 Mb de novo deletion at 1q25 in a girl with Cornelia de Lange syndrome [MIM 122470] and a t(5;13)(p13.1;q12.1), and it appeared that both the deletion and the disruption of the NIPBL [MIM 608677] gene by the 5p translocation breakpoint contributed to the phenotype.…”
Section: Imbalances At the Translocation Breakpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genomic technology of array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (aCGH), which monitors losses or gains in chromosome regions that may harbour novel candidate genes, is not yet a standard test for investigation of NIPBL - and SMC1A -mutation-negative CdLS patients [11,18,34,35], but results obtained with the technique to date are consistent with those of > 30 conventional cytogenetic and FISH-targeted studies that have shown chromosomal abnormalities associated with the CdLS phenotype involving almost all of the chromosomes (reviewed [36]). One study has used aCGH to study probands with CdLS-like features, who had been previously screened for mutations in the two major causative genes; however, this was performed in a relatively small patient cohort [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%