2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11468-017-0583-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Förster Energy Transfer in the Vicinity of Two Metallic Nanospheres (Dimer)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21] A significant advantage of this approach is that it preserves the ability to use standard FRET fluorophore pairs. Several contributions have explored the influence of nanophotonics for FRET using microcavities, 18,[22][23][24] mirrors, [25][26][27][28][29] nanoparticles, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] nanoapertures, [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] nanoantennas, [45][46][47][48][49] waveguides, 50 or hyperbolic metamaterials. 51,52 However, none of these works has clearly demonstrated experimentally the enhancement of the smFRET detection range in the near field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18][19][20][21] A significant advantage of this approach is that it preserves the ability to use standard FRET fluorophore pairs. Several contributions have explored the influence of nanophotonics for FRET using microcavities, 18,[22][23][24] mirrors, [25][26][27][28][29] nanoparticles, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] nanoapertures, [38][39][40][41][42][43][44] nanoantennas, [45][46][47][48][49] waveguides, 50 or hyperbolic metamaterials. 51,52 However, none of these works has clearly demonstrated experimentally the enhancement of the smFRET detection range in the near field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these limits, an alternative strategy uses nanophotonic components to tailor the electromagnetic environment surrounding the FRET pair in such a way to promote the energy transfer and enhance the fluorescence detection rates. A significant advantage of this approach is that it preserves the ability to use standard FRET fluorophore pairs. Several contributions have explored the influence of nanophotonics for FRET using microcavities, , mirrors, nanoparticles, nanoapertures, nanoantennas, waveguides, or hyperbolic metamaterials. , However, none of these works has clearly demonstrated experimentally the enhancement of the smFRET detection range in the near-field. Actually, most cases consider short donor–acceptor separations (on the order or below the Förster radius) in order to ease the optical detection. ,,,,,, It should be acknowledged that long-range energy transfer over distances up to several micrometers has been reported, but these studies are based on radiative dipole–dipole coupling ( i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…two) metallic spherical particles. 23 Nevertheless, the challenge remains to determine the Green's tensor of complex, arbitrary, inhomogeneous, dispersive, and absorbing environments, either numerically or analytically. This problem limits the FRET rate investigations, with researchers typically resorting to effective models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the excitation point of view, photonic antennas can open new energy transfer routes due to the strong confinement of the near-field becoming comparable to the donor-acceptor distance [18], whereas the modification of the LDOS can affect both, the k FRET and the decay rates of both donor and acceptor [19,20]. As a result, the two main parameters used to experimentally characterize FRET: k FRET and E FRET can be modified by the presence of the antenna [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%