2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Förster Energy Transfer in Core–Shell Nanoparticles: Theoretical Model and Monte Carlo Study

Abstract: The model of Forster excitation energy transfer on a spherical core−shell nanoparticle was presented. A general expression for fluorescence intensity decay was obtained for an arbitrary number of acceptors linked chemically to the shell. It was found that the dynamical behavior of the system is extremely sensitive to the number of acceptors and the size of the nanoparticle. Monte Carlo simulations performed for the energy transfer parameters taken from an independent experiment show excellent agreement with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy transfer parameters used in Monte Carlo simulations were determined from the spectroscopic measurements (absorption and fluorescence spectra, donor fluorescence lifetime) performed by us (donor fluorescence quantum yield , = 3.82 ns, critical distances: ) and were fixed during the simulation process. However, for the D TR A structure, as revealed in Figure 5 b, one observes nonexponential and generally faster fluorescence intensity decay, which is a result of efficient direct energy transfer from the donor to closely located acceptors (no energy migration).This time experimental data could be very well described not only by Monte-Carlo simulations but also by Equation (2) resulting from the analytical model for N D / N A = 1/335 [ 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Energy transfer parameters used in Monte Carlo simulations were determined from the spectroscopic measurements (absorption and fluorescence spectra, donor fluorescence lifetime) performed by us (donor fluorescence quantum yield , = 3.82 ns, critical distances: ) and were fixed during the simulation process. However, for the D TR A structure, as revealed in Figure 5 b, one observes nonexponential and generally faster fluorescence intensity decay, which is a result of efficient direct energy transfer from the donor to closely located acceptors (no energy migration).This time experimental data could be very well described not only by Monte-Carlo simulations but also by Equation (2) resulting from the analytical model for N D / N A = 1/335 [ 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the case of the D MIG A arrangement ( Figure 5 a), where one deals virtually only with donors, the observed fluorescence intensity decay is practically monoexponential with the lifetime τ = 3.82 ns. This is quite typical of systems in which energy migration is a dominant or exclusive process [ 24 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. The experimental data obtained remain in excellent agreement with those of Monte Carlo simulations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations