Life history variation in Pisidium (Bivalvia: Pisidiidae) fsmo J. Holopainen and Ilkka Hanski Hulupainen, I. J. und Hanski, I. 1986. Life history variation in Pisidium (Bivalvia: Pisidiidae). -Holarct. Ecol. 9: 85-98.Intraspecific variation in the maximum shell length of Pisidium is small in comparison with variation in the life span of the clams, from 4 mo to 4 yr. The use of shell length as a measure of size is complicated by large intraspecific variation in the weightlength relationship, a possible reflection of resource availability on the weight of the soft parts. Maximum embryo length is relatively constant (1 mm) in the majority of species but litter size is variable (1 to 40), generally increasing with parent size. The time of egg-laying is determined by the size of the clam, season, and previous episode of reproduction, while the timing of the release of embryos, depending also on embryonic growth rale, is additionally affected by temperature and oxygen conditions. In brief, the maximum adult and embryo lengths are relatively conservative traits while growth rates vary by an order of magnitude. Reproductive effort, when measured by the ratio of litter weight to parent weight, may increase or decrease with parent length and age. Both semelparous and iteroparous populations are known in several species. We suggest that if maximum adult length can be reached by the first reproductive season (in a favourable environment) the population is semelparous, otherwise (in an unfavourable environment) the population is iteroparous. Gravid elams in semelparous populations continue to grow, and thus assimilation cannot be meaningfully partitioned into reproduction, somalic growth and maintenance. Along a depth gradient from 8 lo 65 m, maximum and mature shell lengths, embryo length and litter size varies significantly in Pisidium conventus subpopulations not distinguishable electrophoretically. Large clams in deep water produce large embryos but small litters, which is contrary to the general trend of increasing litter size with parent length. Low food availability that decreases juvenile growth rate may restrict litter size in this case.