2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2012.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation of the third-order Grüneisen parameter at extreme compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory of materials at infinite pressure originally due to Stacey [1,2] and further developed by Shanker et al [17,18] has been extended in the present study to determine the n-th order pressure derivatives of bulk modulus at extreme compression. Using some basic principles of calculus it has been found that the higher order pressure derivatives of bulk modulus can be determined only with the help of first and second pressure derivatives of bulk modulus at infinite pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The theory of materials at infinite pressure originally due to Stacey [1,2] and further developed by Shanker et al [17,18] has been extended in the present study to determine the n-th order pressure derivatives of bulk modulus at extreme compression. Using some basic principles of calculus it has been found that the higher order pressure derivatives of bulk modulus can be determined only with the help of first and second pressure derivatives of bulk modulus at infinite pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (15) and (16) The left hand side of equation 18can be written as (19) where K"' = d 3 K/dP 3 . It has been found [17,18,20] that the right hand side of Eq. (19) is positive finite equal to the third order Grüneisen parameter at infinite pressure…”
Section: Infinite Pressure Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…0 q  in the limit V tends zero or P tends to infinity [11][12][13].Obviously, q deduced from Eq. (1) doesn't satisfy this boundary condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%