2011
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7110.1000131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation, Nutritional Evaluation and Storage Study of Supplementary Food (Panjiri)

Abstract: Supplementary foods were formulated from locally available flours of cereal grain and legumes such as wheat flour, soybean flour and chick pea flour using household technologies like blending and roasting. The proximate composition of product used for preparation of supplementary food fortified with 10% skimmed milk powder contained higher amount of protein and other nutrients. They contained proteins (16.2 to 21.1%), fat (1.9 to 4.5%), fiber (1.28 to 1.78%), ash (0.7 to 1.40%) and carbohydrates (67.66 to 77.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy, fat and protein content were reported as 430 kcal, 16 and 14 per cent in corn soy-based supplementary food (Amegovu et al, 2014). Similar findings were reported by Sadana and Chabra (2004), Salve et al (2011), Ghatge (2012) and Dubey et al (2012). Agha (2004)…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Energy, fat and protein content were reported as 430 kcal, 16 and 14 per cent in corn soy-based supplementary food (Amegovu et al, 2014). Similar findings were reported by Sadana and Chabra (2004), Salve et al (2011), Ghatge (2012) and Dubey et al (2012). Agha (2004)…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…T4 and T3 treatments were significantly different (p Ͻ 0.05) for sensory parameters of aroma, taste and overall acceptability (Table II). Good acceptability of supplementary food panjiri formulated from locally available flours of cereal and legumes using household technologies like blending and roasting was reported by Salve et al (2011). The overall acceptability of supplementary food prepared from germinated wheat and mung bean flour was reported significantly higher when compared to control formulations by Imtiaz et al (2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Panel members were advised to use verbal descriptions, and convert them into scores. 6 The scores were based on the following criteria: like extremely: 9; Like moderately: 7-8; like slightly: 5-6; dislike slightly: 3-4; and dislike extremely: 0-2. The scores were averaged and rounded to the nearest whole number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the earlier study by (Karwasra et al, 2021) [17] , the moisture, ash, protein, fat, fibre and carbohydrates content of wheat flour panjiri was identified to be 1.24, 0.82, 8.76, 13.60, 1.18 and 87.57%, respectively. In the study of (Salve et al, 2011) [31] , the results of proximate analysis of wheat flour panjiri was moisture 1.52%, ash 0.72%, protein 12.2%, fat 13.91%, fiber 1.31% and carbohydrates 71.20%.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Proximate Compositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…50% each. (Salve et al, 2011) [31] , prepared the traditional panjiri by roasting the wheat flour at 70-80 °C, and then mixing it with refined sugar.…”
Section: Preparation Of Panjirimentioning
confidence: 99%