2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation and validation of meatal stenosis grading system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of the meatus and cosmesis was subjective in nature. The size of the meatus was assessed according to grading by Mekayten et al as follows:[ 5 ] Grade 0 – open meatus and mucosa seen; Grade 1 – open meatus and mild mucosa seen; and Grade 2 – pinpoint meatus and no mucosa seen.…”
Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of the meatus and cosmesis was subjective in nature. The size of the meatus was assessed according to grading by Mekayten et al as follows:[ 5 ] Grade 0 – open meatus and mucosa seen; Grade 1 – open meatus and mild mucosa seen; and Grade 2 – pinpoint meatus and no mucosa seen.…”
Section: Aterials and M Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%