2008
DOI: 10.1080/02652040802476187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulation and evaluation of albumin microspheres and its enteric coating using a spray-dryer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…increase in PI of 63.99 ± 22.42%. According to Bejugam et al (2008), the particle size distributions of the enteric surface-coated particles are potentially influenced by the presence of other types of particles along with the targeted surface-coated particles. In other words, the enteric surface-coated dispersions may include small percentages of only drug nanoparticles, only Eudragit Õ L100-55 nanoparticles as well as drug-Eudragit Õ L100-55 nanoparticles.…”
Section: In Vitro Characterization Of Enteric Surface-coated Cubosomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…increase in PI of 63.99 ± 22.42%. According to Bejugam et al (2008), the particle size distributions of the enteric surface-coated particles are potentially influenced by the presence of other types of particles along with the targeted surface-coated particles. In other words, the enteric surface-coated dispersions may include small percentages of only drug nanoparticles, only Eudragit Õ L100-55 nanoparticles as well as drug-Eudragit Õ L100-55 nanoparticles.…”
Section: In Vitro Characterization Of Enteric Surface-coated Cubosomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the design of promising enteric surface-coated carriers has gained considerable attention in the last years (Chandy et al, 2002;Eerikäinen & Kauppinen, 2003;Bejugam et al 2008;Zhang et al, 2011;Hao et al, 2013). Yet, most of the reported methods suffer from many limitations including the lengthy production steps, the use of organic solvents, the need of special sophisticated equipment and/or the limited scaling up possibilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,36,37 Briefly, 500 µL of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA) was added to 10 mg of magnetic microspheres and vortexed at regular interval for 30 minutes. After two hours of incubation at room temperature, 500 µL of buffer B (200 mM NaOH, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.2 M ascorbic acid) was added to the suspension and vortexed.…”
Section: Determination Of Iron Oxide and Drug Content In Magnetic Micmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biodegradable nanoparticles were prepared by the previously established method by our laboratory using the Buchi Mini Spray Dryer B-191 (9,10,13,27). Briefly, a 1% solution of sterile BSA in sterile water was prepared and kept for overnight crosslinking with glutaraldehyde.…”
Section: Preparation Of Nanoparticles Using Bsamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrated that these vaccine-loaded nanoparticles are taken up by antigen-presenting cells and induced a robust innate immune response, a prerequisite for inducing adaptive immunity (9). The novel vaccine nanoparticle formulation has many advantages since it does not require chemical conjugation to a protein carrier, biodegradable, slowly release the antigen, highly immunogenic, inexpensive, easy to manufacture on large scale, highly stable, and does not require the cold chain in the logistics of vaccine delivery which reduce the cost and increase the availability (10)(11)(12). Furthermore, these vaccine nanoparticles designed for oral delivery via the mucosal route help induce an optimal immune response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%