2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00151-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulating national information technology strategies: A preference ranking model using PROMETHEE method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Olson (2001) used PROMETHEE I and II to evaluate and to rank the abilities of eight baseball teams according to five criteria: hitting, power, speed, fielding, and pitching. Albadvi (2004) applied PROM-ETHEE II to formulate national information technology strategies.…”
Section: Author(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Olson (2001) used PROMETHEE I and II to evaluate and to rank the abilities of eight baseball teams according to five criteria: hitting, power, speed, fielding, and pitching. Albadvi (2004) applied PROM-ETHEE II to formulate national information technology strategies.…”
Section: Author(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author(s) Topic Specific area Other tools/ methodologies used Albadvi (2004) Government Formulating national information technology strategies Cluster analysis Coelho et al (2003) Design…”
Section: Table 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its main activities were: e-government, e-commerce, launching governmental organization websites, IT training and software industry development. Unfortunately, the main part of this budget was allocated to governmental organizations and ministries (Albadvi, 2004), and no important changes in their performance have resulted.…”
Section: Implementation Of Proposed Model For Development Of Ninimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROMETHEE has been applied in different areas, such as Information Technology (IT) design (Albadvi, 2004;Albadvi et al, 2006;Gal and Hanne, 1999;Roy, 1985). It has also Weight Coefficients and Stability Intervals tools for sensitivity analysis on evaluation results (Albadvi et al, 2006;Diakoulaki, 2003).…”
Section: Use Of the Decision Making Programmentioning
confidence: 99%