2012
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/52/12/123007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formularization of the confinement enhancement factor as a function of the heating profile for FFHR-d1 core plasma design

Abstract: A quantitative estimation of the confinement enhancement due to the heating profile effect is introduced to the helical fusion DEMO reactor design of FFHR-d1, based on the experimental results of the Large Helical Device. By applying this to the direct profile extrapolation (DPE) method, radial profiles in the reactor are extrapolated from experimental results. In reactor plasmas, the heat deposition profile of alpha heating is expected to be peaked in the core region as in the case of tangential neutral beam … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intrinsic structure of the FFHR-d1 is similar to the Large Helical Device (LHD) [5]. While device size is four times larger than the LHD, the major radius (R) is R = 15.6 m [6][7][8]. In the case of the heliotron type devices, the edge magnetic structure is more complicated than the tokamak devices, and an intrinsic divertor exists without additional coils [9].…”
Section: Structural Advantage Of Ffhr-d1 Divertormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrinsic structure of the FFHR-d1 is similar to the Large Helical Device (LHD) [5]. While device size is four times larger than the LHD, the major radius (R) is R = 15.6 m [6][7][8]. In the case of the heliotron type devices, the edge magnetic structure is more complicated than the tokamak devices, and an intrinsic divertor exists without additional coils [9].…”
Section: Structural Advantage Of Ffhr-d1 Divertormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both scalings show the socalled gyro-Bohm property, as is also recognized in the scalings for tokamaks [14]. The plasma parameters in FFHR-d1 have been estimated by using the Direct Profile Extrapolation (DPE) method, which is based on the gyro-Bohm model [9,[15][16][17][18]. According to the DPE method, two devices having an identical value of Rc Bc 3/4 can Fig.…”
Section: The Ffhr-c1mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The FFHR-b2 is basically a beam-plasma fusion reactor, where 80 keV -5 MW tangential D beam is injected to the target DT plasma, of which the T ratio is changed from 0 to 100 %. The fusion output is estimated by an iterative calculation as follows; (1) determine the ion and electron temperature profiles by the DPE (Direct Profile Extrapolation) method [28][29][30][31] using assumed ion and electron density profiles and a heat deposition profile of NBI, (2) calculate the magnetic equilibrium by the VMEC code [32] using the pressure profiles obtained, (3) calculate the NBI heat deposition profile and the birth profile of alpha particles generated by the beam-plasma fusion reaction by the FIT3D code [33] using the magnetic equilibrium, (4) return to (1) and recalculate the temperature profiles, and then repeat the procedure from (1) to (4) until the temperature profiles converge, (5) recalculate the heat deposition and pressure profiles of NBI and alpha particles by the GNET code [34][35][36] using the converged temperature profiles, (6) return to (1) and recalculate the temperature profiles, and then repeat the procedure from (1) to ( 6) until the temperature profiles and magnetic equilibrium converge. In this study, the last iteration was not necessary because the magnetic equilibrium obtained using the GNET results were already well converged.…”
Section: Expected Performance Of the Ffhr-b2mentioning
confidence: 99%