2000
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formulae Describing Subjective Attributes for Sound Fields Based on a Model of the Auditory-Brain System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fundamental subjective attributes for the sound field in a concert hall are accurately described by the model of auditory-brain system when taking into account the contributions of the ACF and IACF mechanisms. For example, the speech intelligibility of a spoken syllable with a single reflection can be calculated from temporal factors extracted by the ACF [6,7]. In concert hall acoustics, the theory of subjective preference allows one to calculate the scale values of subjective preference in terms of four orthogonal factors: the listening level ðLLÞ; the initial time-delay gap between the direct and the first reflection ðDt 1 Þ; the subsequent reverberation time ðT sub Þ; and the interaural correlation coefficient ðIACCÞ [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental subjective attributes for the sound field in a concert hall are accurately described by the model of auditory-brain system when taking into account the contributions of the ACF and IACF mechanisms. For example, the speech intelligibility of a spoken syllable with a single reflection can be calculated from temporal factors extracted by the ACF [6,7]. In concert hall acoustics, the theory of subjective preference allows one to calculate the scale values of subjective preference in terms of four orthogonal factors: the listening level ðLLÞ; the initial time-delay gap between the direct and the first reflection ðDt 1 Þ; the subsequent reverberation time ðT sub Þ; and the interaural correlation coefficient ðIACCÞ [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widening the frequencyr ange to 1500 Hz reduced correlation values. With a500-Hz low-pass cut-off frequencythe highest correlation is 0.67, obtained when considering the W IACF with a δ taken 10% lower than the IACC as proposed by Ando et al [32]. These authors showed that the "Apparent Source Width" (ASW)w as correlated to IACC and W IACF .T heya lso proposed af ormula combining both IACC and W IACF as an attribute describing "spaciousness".…”
Section: "Feeling Of Space" Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Important subjective responses of sound fields in relation to all the above-mentioned all of orthogonal factors are listed in Table 4. These include preferred conditions of performers [30], speech intelligibility [18], and reverberance of sound fields [31]. 6.…”
Section: Subjective Preference and Any Subjective Responses For Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to experimental results on the pitch perceived when listening to the bandpass noises without any fundamental frequency, the pitch s p is expressed by equation (6) as well. The strength of the pitch sensation is described by the magnitude of the first peak of the ACF, f 1 [18]. For the signal of a short duration, factor D might be taken into account.…”
Section: Factors Extracted From Iacfmentioning
confidence: 99%