1990
DOI: 10.5465/256578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forms of Interorganizational Governance for Multinational Alliances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
203
1
8

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
203
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Internalizing activities under conditions of rapid technological change impose inflexibility precisely when flexibility is most needed (Poppo & Zenger, 1998). In fact, literature analyzing strategic technology partnering has found that, whenever firms need quick responses to changes in technological leadership, non-equity agreements are preferred to joint ventures because they provide firms with greater strategic flexibility (Osborn & Baughn, 1990). Specifically, previous research has shown that greater use of outsourcing may deliver more flexibility, which may help firms to respond quickly to unanticipated threats and market opportunities (Hitt et al, 1998).…”
Section: Technological Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internalizing activities under conditions of rapid technological change impose inflexibility precisely when flexibility is most needed (Poppo & Zenger, 1998). In fact, literature analyzing strategic technology partnering has found that, whenever firms need quick responses to changes in technological leadership, non-equity agreements are preferred to joint ventures because they provide firms with greater strategic flexibility (Osborn & Baughn, 1990). Specifically, previous research has shown that greater use of outsourcing may deliver more flexibility, which may help firms to respond quickly to unanticipated threats and market opportunities (Hitt et al, 1998).…”
Section: Technological Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Alliance" is a broad term capturing many forms of interfirm cooperation that go beyond market tranactions. Explanations of alliances in the literature focus on the trade-off between the perceived advantages of full ownership, market contracts, and intermediate positions (Contractor & Lorange, 1988;Hagedoorn, 1993;Osborn & Baughn, 1990). Prominent approaches to the systematic comparison of the various forms that interfirm alliances can take (such as long-term purchasing agreements, licensing, collaboration on R&D, technology exchange, and joint venture) are the strategic behavior perspective (Kogut, 1988;Porter & Fuller, 1986), the theory of international production (Dunning, 1995), and transaction cost economics (Gulati, 1995;Hennart, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gulati & Singh, 1998;Oxley, 1997); risks; partnership task-scope and transaction-level characteristics (e.g. Oxley, 1999;Oxley & Sampson, 2004); technological intensity (Osborn & Baughn, 1990); strategic motivation (Nielsen, 2003); division of labour (Reuer, Zollo, & Singh, 2002); task complexity and inter-partner diversity (White & Lui, 2005); trust among partners (e.g. Gulati, 1995a;Krishnan, Martin, & Noorderhaven, 2006;Lui & Ngo, 2004;Nooteboom, Berger, & Noorderhaven, 1997;Zaheer, McEvily, & Perrone, 1998); and inter-organizational structures (e.g.…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%