2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forming part families by using genetic algorithm and designing machine cells under demand changes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defersha and Chen (2006) used parallel machines and outsource services to overcome dynamic part demand defects in cell forming process. Jeon and Leep (2006) presented a model for scheduling dynamic cells where machine failures can cause waiting times and reduce system capacity accordingly. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Aryanezhad, et al (2007) considered dynamic part demands and parts mixed for a reconfigurable part routing problem.…”
Section: Fig 1 Intracellular and Intercellular Materials Transferringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defersha and Chen (2006) used parallel machines and outsource services to overcome dynamic part demand defects in cell forming process. Jeon and Leep (2006) presented a model for scheduling dynamic cells where machine failures can cause waiting times and reduce system capacity accordingly. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Aryanezhad, et al (2007) considered dynamic part demands and parts mixed for a reconfigurable part routing problem.…”
Section: Fig 1 Intracellular and Intercellular Materials Transferringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the CMS C it is assumed that each part is processed in one cell or outsourced totally considering machine capacity (Schaller, 2007;Jeon & Leep, 2006;Ghezavati & Saidi-Mehrabad, 2011). This approach is clearly illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Classical Cms Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of CMS is to determine the parts families and machine cells under pre-defined objectives and constraints. The CMS has more advantages such as: decreased setup times, reduced work-in-process inventories, improved product quality, shorter lead times, reduced tool requirements, improved productivity, better quality and production control, increment in flexibility and decreased material handling cost (Solimanpur et al, 2009;Jeon & Leep, 2006). The issue of CMS has been widely investigated in the literature and it has received more attention by authors in the recent decades (see Singh (1993) for a literature review on CMS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simulated annealing algorithm was applied to solve the presented problem. Jeon and Leep [17] developed a two-phase procedure to con gure a CMS. In the rst phase, they used a genetic algorithm to obtain part families using a new similarity coecient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%