2019
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201801226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formic Acid Dehydrogenation by Ruthenium Catalyst – Computational and Kinetic Analysis with the Energy Span Model

Abstract: The ruthenium (cis‐RuCl2(DPPM)2) based catalytic dehydrogenation reaction of formic acid in the presence of an amine base in a biphasic system experimentally tested by Treigerman and Sasson (ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 5816) was studied computationally to ascertain its mechanism. The energy span model was applied on the double‐hybrid DFT computed energy profile to comprehend its kinetics. The catalytic network includes three possible interconnected cycles depending on the ancillary ligands, going through decarbox… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(151 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 0 is in fast equilibrium with the active cycles ( 7 → 18 ), and it draws most of the catalyst concentration into itself, it should be considered in the TOF calculation. A similar situation is found in Kozuch’s work …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since 0 is in fast equilibrium with the active cycles ( 7 → 18 ), and it draws most of the catalyst concentration into itself, it should be considered in the TOF calculation. A similar situation is found in Kozuch’s work …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A similar situation is found in Kozuch's work. 62 For path A (Figure 2), the AUTOF program identifies the TOF-determining intermediate (TDI) as 2 17 and the TOFdetermining transition state (TDTS) as 1 TS 7-14_N , corresponding to an energetic span (δE) of 22.4 kcal/mol and TOF of 0.67 h −1 . For path D (Figure 4), TDI is 2 17 and TDTS is 2 TS 12-13 , corresponding to δE = 15.2 kcal/mol and TOF = 1.1 × 10 5 h −1 .…”
Section: Preliminary Mechanistic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noteworthy, all previous values are for standard 1 M concentrations. A concentration correction to the Gibbs energies can be included if necessary as a RT ·ln­[ C ] term, ,, and to match the low water concentrations in the experiment, this correction is a must. At approximately 10 mM (see below), it will theoretically add another 11 kJ mol –1 to T3 per water molecule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Originally developed for mechanisms without branching, the ESM was extended to describe reaction networks with parallel reaction pathways using graph theory. 6 This ESM approach has been demonstrated 7 and inspired software development. 8 While strong fundamentals have been established, the ESM approach lacks rigor in its underlying assumptions and agreement with MKM results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistic reaction networks describing a single overall reaction or selectivity between multiple reactions are ubiquitous. , Reaction flux can traverse multiple parallel pathways leading to a complex ensemble of contributions to the observed activity. Multiple softwares have been developed specifically to analyze reaction networks, , with MKMs commonly used .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%