2011
DOI: 10.5424/fs/20112003-11042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Former agriculture impacts on properties of Norway spruce forest

Abstract: Forest floor is considered a major feature distinguishing forest from agricultural soils. Forest floor develops as forest stands grow and is composed of more or less altered plant-tissue biomass accumulated on the soil surface. Our study's aim was to find whether properties of both the organic layers and mineral soil differ according to the land-use history of the sites compared. Each site included an afforested area of immature 50-year-old spruce forest (AFF) on formerly agricultural land plus an adjacent are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After afforestation of the agricultural soil, a considerable part of the accumulated carbon is concentrated in the upper layers, gradually formed by forest litter; its formation and accumulation is noticeable already in young stands (Kacálek et al 2011). In the phase immediately following the afforestation of agricultural land, there is a slight decrease in soil organic carbon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After afforestation of the agricultural soil, a considerable part of the accumulated carbon is concentrated in the upper layers, gradually formed by forest litter; its formation and accumulation is noticeable already in young stands (Kacálek et al 2011). In the phase immediately following the afforestation of agricultural land, there is a slight decrease in soil organic carbon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All computations were performed in R software (R Core Team 2016). other benefits such as higher timber mass production or higher biodiversity Woziwoda et al 2014;Vacek et al 2016;Cukor et al 2017a;Vacek et al 2017) -significantly increase the carbon content bound in the ecosystem (Kacálek et al 2011), which in turn contributes to reducing carbon concentrations in the atmosphere (Novara et al 2014;Woziwoda et al 2014).…”
Section: Statistical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But overall, the content of P is higher compared with forest stands. That can be attributed to ameliorative efforts in the past (falkengren-Grerup et al 2006;Kacálek et al 2011). The same applies to the content of available K and Mg; in case of these nutrients, the differences were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our framework is but one example of how several lines of evidence can be used to discriminate alternative explanations for the correlation between contemporary ecological conditions and historical land use, and to partition ecological variability among different historical land use periods. 2002, De Gryze et al 2004, Latty et al 2004, Falkengren-Grerup et al 2006, Flinn and Marks 2007, Kopecký and Vojta 2009, Clark and Johnson 2011, Kacalek et al 2011, Poeplau et al 2011, Raiesi 2012; full citations in main article). These studies vary in their details; some evaluate ''recovery rates'' while others document state changes caused by past agriculture, some are reviews or data compilations while others are place-based original studies, and they differ in the soil properties and mechanisms through with agrarian legacies are expressed.…”
Section: Understanding Urban Soils and Ecological Legaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%