2009
DOI: 10.21913/ijei.v5i2.614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software?

Abstract: The need for effective education to enhance students' understanding and development of academic integrity has been well established, particularly for international students new to tertiary study in English-speaking countries. Most research recommends the use of methods such as instruction and warnings, as part of a plagiarism education programme. Few studies have looked at the role of formative feedback through tutorial intervention in the process of academic writing, in which use of the text-matching tool Tur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although workshop attendance and completion of surveys were voluntary, participation rates were high, particularly in the first and postgraduate student groups, thus indicating that respondents were broadly representative of the participant groups targeted for the study. Higher instances of plagiarism have been observed for international students, and this has been attributed to both language and cultural factors (16), so it is a strength of the study that the views of non‐English‐speaking background (NESB) students are well represented (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although workshop attendance and completion of surveys were voluntary, participation rates were high, particularly in the first and postgraduate student groups, thus indicating that respondents were broadly representative of the participant groups targeted for the study. Higher instances of plagiarism have been observed for international students, and this has been attributed to both language and cultural factors (16), so it is a strength of the study that the views of non‐English‐speaking background (NESB) students are well represented (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identify this as an important question to be addressed. Thus, this study draws attention to technology-enhanced lan-guage learning, in line with the increasing number of studies (e.g., Chew et al 2015; Davis and Carroll 2009;Rolfe 2011) suggesting online feedback may benefit learn-ers, particularly in institutions of higher education. In attempting to delve further into this issue, the present study focused more on the learners' perceptions, i.e., their ideas, beliefs, or thoughts about online feedback instead of focusing on the feedback itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…McCarthy and Rogerson (2009) report on the positive educational effects of teaching graduate students to interpret PDS results. Davis and Carroll (2009) explain how PDSes can be used for instruction in academic values, rather than assessment of students' source use, and Rees and Emerson (2009) see a positive effect of PDS use on instructors' understanding of academic integrity pedagogy. Deborah Weber-Wulff (2014) offers a chapter of advice on using various PDSes; her analysis of this software points out that plagiarism detection software is not as reliable as popular conception would have it.…”
Section: Pedagogical Best Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%