2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation, reactivity, and aging of ferric oxide particles formed from Fe(II) and Fe(III) sources: Implications for iron bioavailability in the marine environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
6
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fertilization bioassays dissolved Fe ranged between 0.015 AE 0.003 (AE SD) and 0.080 AE 0.041 mg/L, whereas in the larvae experiments the highest concentrations of dissolved Fe generally occurred after 72-h exposure, ranging between 0.027 and 0.195 mg/L. Both the solubility and the reactivity of amorphous ferric oxyhydroxides are influenced by a variety of factors such as crystallinity, particle size, and aggregate structure [30], thereby possibly generating different aging patterns [28] and contributing to our contrary findings. Furthermore, contrary to previous findings, we measured a small increase in labile Fe over time in the labile Fe concentration relative to the total Fe concentration for all nominal Fe concentrations; however, the highest labile Fe concentration was still only 1.21 mg/L after 96-h exposure (100 mg/L nominal dose).…”
Section: Solubility and Lability Of Fe In Test Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the fertilization bioassays dissolved Fe ranged between 0.015 AE 0.003 (AE SD) and 0.080 AE 0.041 mg/L, whereas in the larvae experiments the highest concentrations of dissolved Fe generally occurred after 72-h exposure, ranging between 0.027 and 0.195 mg/L. Both the solubility and the reactivity of amorphous ferric oxyhydroxides are influenced by a variety of factors such as crystallinity, particle size, and aggregate structure [30], thereby possibly generating different aging patterns [28] and contributing to our contrary findings. Furthermore, contrary to previous findings, we measured a small increase in labile Fe over time in the labile Fe concentration relative to the total Fe concentration for all nominal Fe concentrations; however, the highest labile Fe concentration was still only 1.21 mg/L after 96-h exposure (100 mg/L nominal dose).…”
Section: Solubility and Lability Of Fe In Test Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Gametes were separated and cross-fertilized using the same methods as in the fertilization experiments. Fertilized embryos were reared at densities of approximately 2 to 3 larvae/mL in gently aerated 90-L tubs that were maintained with approximately 50% water exchange every 1 to 2 d. Larvae were deemed motile enough to conduct toxicity experiments at 4.5 d. Because of the change in reactivity reported for Fe(III) with aging [28], larval motility experiments were conducted using a static nonrenewal test and Fe concentrations were made up approximately 2 h before the experiment start time. Treatments consisted of 5 Â 20 mL replicates of each Fe(III) concentration and 5 Â 20-mL replicates of each concentration of the particulate reference (SiO 2 ), and there was one set of 5 Â 20-mL replicate controls.…”
Section: Experiments 5: Larval Survival and Motility Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, during the experiment, Fe(II) was rapidly oxidized to form iron oxide/hydroxide (Taylor and Konhauser, 2011;Bligh and Waite, 2011) and precipitated on the surface of the quartz sand, which might have gradually transformed into crystalline iron mineral phase (Bligh and Waite, 2011) mainly consisting of goethite. The arsenic bound to goethite has formed monodentate mononuclear complexes on the surface of goethite, where abundant adsorption sites prompted the absorption of a large amount of arsenic, resulting in a significant lag in arsenic breakthrough and arsenic removal from the aqueous phase.…”
Section: The Efficacy Of Arsenic Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%