2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of the Wulong gold deposit, Liaodong gold Province, NE China: Constraints from zircon U–Pb age, sericite Ar–Ar age, and H–O–S–He isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The δ 34 S values of pyrite at Jinying show a narrow range from + 0.1 ‰ to + 2.8‰ (mean = 1.6 ‰, n = 24), which are consistent with those from the typical magmatic-hydrothermal deposit worldwide (0 ± 3 ‰, Ohmoto & Rye 1979) and from magmatic-hydrothermal Au deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula (e.g. Wulong, Liu et al 2019, Zhang et al 2020; Xinfang, Zhang et al 2022a). These data indicate that the sulphur of the Jinying deposit was derived from a magmatic source.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The δ 34 S values of pyrite at Jinying show a narrow range from + 0.1 ‰ to + 2.8‰ (mean = 1.6 ‰, n = 24), which are consistent with those from the typical magmatic-hydrothermal deposit worldwide (0 ± 3 ‰, Ohmoto & Rye 1979) and from magmatic-hydrothermal Au deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula (e.g. Wulong, Liu et al 2019, Zhang et al 2020; Xinfang, Zhang et al 2022a). These data indicate that the sulphur of the Jinying deposit was derived from a magmatic source.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is worth noting that similar δ 34 S values were also reported for the Wulong goldfield (Yu et al ., 2018; Feng et al ., 2019; Chen et al ., 2020), which is located about 100 km northeast of the Xinfang deposit and was formed from magmatic‐hydrothermal fluids (Yu et al ., 2018; Feng et al ., 2019; Liu, Zhang, et al ., 2019; Chen et al ., 2020; Cheng et al ., 2020; Yu, Zeng, Frimmel, et al ., 2020; Zhang et al ., 2020). The δ 34 S values for the sulfides within the auriferous quartz veins of the Wulong gold deposit range from 0.9 to 3.9‰ (Yu et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, previous C–H–O isotopes suggest that the Xinfang ore‐forming fluids were derived from a magmatic‐hydrothermal source (Guo et al ., 2005; Wei et al ., 2007). Recent articles also argue that the gold deposits hosted within the Liaodong Peninsula, such as the Wulong (Liu, Wang, et al ., 2018; Yu et al ., 2018; Liu, Zhang, et al ., 2019; Chen et al ., 2020; Cheng et al ., 2020; Yu, Zeng, Frimmel, et al ., 2020; Zeng et al ., 2020; Zhang et al ., 2020), Sidagou (Feng et al ., 2019; Chen et al ., 2020), Baiyun (Liu, Liu, et al ., 2019; Sun et al ., 2019; Zhang et al ., 2019; Sun, Zeng, Zhou, et al ., 2020), and Xiaotongjiapuzi (Liu et al ., 2020), can be classified as magmatic‐hydrothermal gold systems. These deposit are related to lithospheric thinning within the northeastern NCC, which was triggered by the subduction of the Paleo‐Pacific plate during the Early Cretaceous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fluid inclusion volatiles from the Wulong deposit are dominated by H 2 O-CO 2 -CH 4 , and temperatures and salinity of the ore-forming stage vary from 219 to 328 °C and from 0.18 to 7.86 wt% NaCl equivalent, respectively (Yu et al 2018). The δD, δ 18 O, and δ 34 S values from quartzsulfide ores range from -98 ‰ to -77 ‰, +4.8 ‰ to +8.6 ‰, and +1.1‰ to +2.4‰, respectively, interpreted to represent magmatic fluid and sulfur sources (Liu et al 2019).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%