2016
DOI: 10.17221/18/2016-agricecon
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of the theoretical framework for the comparative analysis of post-socialist countries

Abstract: Th e beginning of the 90s was accompanied by revolutionary changes in the world economy. Newly created incentives for the comparative economics/economy were tackling, inter alia, the post-socialist countries, that were already exposed to the transformation and reform processes. Models of economic systems formed in this period have initiated a great discussion among the relevant stakeholders. Th is fruitful discussion has led to the creation of a number of model approaches, focusing on the defi nition of a comm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Michael E. Porter defined cluster as "a geographically close group of interconnected companies and related institutions in a particular field, linked by common features and complementarities" (Hamilton & Wepster, 2009) Thus, cluster can be understood as a geographically close group of affiliated companies and institutions in a certain area that cooperate and also compete with each other. Within the cluster, several types of entities can be grouped, such as research and education institutions, business enterprises, businesses providing different services to other enterprises within cluster, machine and production technology suppliers, suppliers of various parts and semi-finished products to the final product manufacturer (Cihelkova, 2016). Cluster brings together supply-chain relationships or joint technologies, possibly joint customers and distribution channels, or according to Horecký (2018) and Mészáros (2018) common labor markets and human capital (Lorincová, 2018;Žuľová, Švec, Madleňák, 2018).…”
Section: Clustering Issues Within Entrepreneurship Risk Management and Sustainability -Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael E. Porter defined cluster as "a geographically close group of interconnected companies and related institutions in a particular field, linked by common features and complementarities" (Hamilton & Wepster, 2009) Thus, cluster can be understood as a geographically close group of affiliated companies and institutions in a certain area that cooperate and also compete with each other. Within the cluster, several types of entities can be grouped, such as research and education institutions, business enterprises, businesses providing different services to other enterprises within cluster, machine and production technology suppliers, suppliers of various parts and semi-finished products to the final product manufacturer (Cihelkova, 2016). Cluster brings together supply-chain relationships or joint technologies, possibly joint customers and distribution channels, or according to Horecký (2018) and Mészáros (2018) common labor markets and human capital (Lorincová, 2018;Žuľová, Švec, Madleňák, 2018).…”
Section: Clustering Issues Within Entrepreneurship Risk Management and Sustainability -Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change will require the transformation of information technologies, operating technologies, internet devices; sensors and controllers, robotic systems, artificial intelligence and manufacturing processes to conduct interconnected factories and smart decentralized production (Danaj et al 2018). According to Cihelkova (2016), all of this is executed within informational cyber-mass systems in the environment of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It is about a whole new stage in organizing and controlling the value chain throughout the life of the product.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%