2018
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of rivers and mountains drives diversification of primitively segmented spiders in continental East Asia

Abstract: Aim: Complex topography in continental East Asia mirrors geological events such as formation of rivers and mountains, but to what extent these events drive diversification remains underexplored. We address this question by testing vicariant hypotheses using the primitively segmented spider genera Sinothela and Ganthela, focusing on diversification within Sinothela.Location: Continental East Asia. Methods:We employ a three-way test of six vicariant hypotheses derived from river and mountain formation: (a) phylo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(97 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unlikely that river capture was the main driver for the divergence between the eastern and western lineages, although the models related to river capture had smaller Δ AIC values (e.g., model “no_mig,” Δ AIC = 40, see Table ). Previous studies have indicated that the time estimates of the drainage rearrangements of the Yangtze River and the Yellow River are controversial (they range from the Eocene to the late Pleistocene, see Xu, Kuntner, Liu, Chen, & Li, 2018; Yao et al., 2017, and references therein), and the younger estimate of 3.2 Ma falls within the confidence interval for the estimated divergence between the two lineages (2.38–3.40 Ma, Figure 4). However, if river capture had shaped population divergence and the genetic structure of this species complex, the genetic clusters would be expected to be separated by rivers (Wei, Meng, Bao, & Jiang, 2015; Zhang et al., 2011), which is not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unlikely that river capture was the main driver for the divergence between the eastern and western lineages, although the models related to river capture had smaller Δ AIC values (e.g., model “no_mig,” Δ AIC = 40, see Table ). Previous studies have indicated that the time estimates of the drainage rearrangements of the Yangtze River and the Yellow River are controversial (they range from the Eocene to the late Pleistocene, see Xu, Kuntner, Liu, Chen, & Li, 2018; Yao et al., 2017, and references therein), and the younger estimate of 3.2 Ma falls within the confidence interval for the estimated divergence between the two lineages (2.38–3.40 Ma, Figure 4). However, if river capture had shaped population divergence and the genetic structure of this species complex, the genetic clusters would be expected to be separated by rivers (Wei, Meng, Bao, & Jiang, 2015; Zhang et al., 2011), which is not the case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some key innovations may have facilitated dispersal with subsequent allopatric divergence, whereas others may have allowed species to access newly formed habitats followed by niche or biome shifts that enforce ecological divergence (Gehrke, Kandziora, & Pirie, 2016; Muellner‐Riehl et al., 2019). Furthermore, abiotic conditions (e.g., variables related to the energy–water hypothesis; O'Brien, 2006), habitat heterogeneity as well as edaphic differences between species distribution ranges may have an impact on the diversification of species and/or lineages (Antonelli et al., 2018; Rahbek, Borregaard, Colwell, et al., 2019; Xu, Dimitrov, Shrestha, Rahbek, & Wang, 2019; Xu et al., 2018). Finally, as our focal species originated via adaptive radiation (Sun et al., 2012), which usually involves rapid and extensive ecological diversification, natural selection is also likely to impact this process (Berner & Salzburger, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, Jordan et al (2016) concluded that continental drift is not sufficient to account for the increase in terrestrial species richness observed in the fossil record. Tectonic changes have also been examined recently by studies evaluating the effect of mountain orogeny on diversification using phylogenies of plants (Lagomarsino et al, 2016;Pérez-Escobar et al, 2017) and animals (Condamine et al, 2018;Xu, Kuntner, Liu, Chen, & Li, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our divergence estimates based on the cpDNA results suggest that the small‐magnitude uplift (early Paleocene to late Eocene) of the QM might have been an important factor responsible for the genetic alteration of D. sinensis . Recently, the divergence time of the genus Sinothela was estimated at between 23–2.6 Mya or 10–2.6 Mya in the QM (Xu et al., 2018). Some recent phylogeographical studies have also demonstrated that species distributed at high altitudes diverged due to geological changes and Tertiary climatic oscillations in the west–east and west–central–east parts of the QM (Fang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%