2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Nitrite and Hydrogen Peroxide in Water during the Vacuum Ultraviolet Irradiation Process: Impacts of pH, Dissolved Oxygen, and Nitrate Concentration

Abstract: Photolysis via vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) irradiation is a robust technology capable of inactivating pathogens and degrading micropollutants, and therefore, its application has recently attracted great interest. However, VUV irradiation of water may yield nitrite (NO2 –, a regulated carcinogenic contaminant) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, a compound linked to aging, inflammation, and cancer), thus motivating us to better understand its risks. By applying a novel H2O2 detection method insensitive to coexisting comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the calculated and measured NO 2 – concentrations defined as others (see the reactions in the Method section) accounted for 21.3% (Figures f) and 17.9% (Figure h) of the total measured NO 2 – concentration on average, and the corresponding maxima were 51.9% and 46.3%. Among these, NO 3 – reduction by e aq – , which favors D­[O 2 ]-poor conditions, could be one of the unknown contributions to NO 2 – formation; however, this reaction contribution was not estimated in this study due to the lack of measurements on peroxy radicals (O 2 · – ). At midday, the dominant contributors to NO 2 – underestimation were probably unconsidered photochemical formation (except for R6 since NO 2 – _R6 = 0% in the MLR analysis) under strong solar radiation, , photodecomposition, or hydrogenation. , At midnight, the surplus NO 2 – concentration in the measurement likely resulted from accumulation under stable weather conditions or the loss of NO 2 – (to HONO, N 2 O, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between the calculated and measured NO 2 – concentrations defined as others (see the reactions in the Method section) accounted for 21.3% (Figures f) and 17.9% (Figure h) of the total measured NO 2 – concentration on average, and the corresponding maxima were 51.9% and 46.3%. Among these, NO 3 – reduction by e aq – , which favors D­[O 2 ]-poor conditions, could be one of the unknown contributions to NO 2 – formation; however, this reaction contribution was not estimated in this study due to the lack of measurements on peroxy radicals (O 2 · – ). At midday, the dominant contributors to NO 2 – underestimation were probably unconsidered photochemical formation (except for R6 since NO 2 – _R6 = 0% in the MLR analysis) under strong solar radiation, , photodecomposition, or hydrogenation. , At midnight, the surplus NO 2 – concentration in the measurement likely resulted from accumulation under stable weather conditions or the loss of NO 2 – (to HONO, N 2 O, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These are classical heterogeneous and photochemical reactions occurring in the early morning and midday, respectively. A previous study reported that NO 2 − production increased with increasing HONO concentration and pH (3 < pH < 6), 4,13,21 indicating a possible formation path of NO 2 − from HONO (mainly produced from NO 2 hydrolysis based on kinetic calculations according to the reactions shown in S2) at midday (R5). 10,39 In addition, the simultaneous measurement of SO 3 2− in PM 1.0 samples (with the VACES) presented an early morning peak (Figure S3e), consistent with those of NO 2 and NO 2 − during the highconcentration period, and there might be a certain relationship between SO 3 2− and NO 2 − .…”
Section: Note That the Concentration Comparison Is Based On The Conve...mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, nitrate can be transformed by VUV into nitrite, which is an effective • OH scavenger (1.0 × 10 10 M –1 s –1 ) . Previous studies reported the conversion of 1–20% of nitrate into nitrite, reaching nitrite levels of up to 0.07 mM. , In comparison to nitrate, nitrite showed a much higher inhibition on VUV/UV oxidation even at a low concentration of 0.01 mM . Finally, nitrate can also be activated by VUV 185 nm, which generates • OH via peroxynitrite isomerization or direct activation .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%