2006
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of monodisperse microbubbles in a microfluidic device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
76
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies (Song et al 2006;Xu et al 2006aXu et al , 2006bGarstecki et al 2006) discussed the droplet formation process at T-junction, it will be briefed in this subsection for easy understanding by non-microfluidic researchers such as those working on nanofluids.…”
Section: Droplet Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although several studies (Song et al 2006;Xu et al 2006aXu et al , 2006bGarstecki et al 2006) discussed the droplet formation process at T-junction, it will be briefed in this subsection for easy understanding by non-microfluidic researchers such as those working on nanofluids.…”
Section: Droplet Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometrical techniques have been used to create droplets of various sizes and size distributions (Link et al 2004). In microfluidics, T-junction microchannel is one of the most frequently used configurations for droplet formation and manipulation (Thorsen et al 2001;Nisisako et al 2002;Xu et al 2006aXu et al , 2006b. The wide usage of this T-junction geometry is due to the ease of droplet formation and uniformity of the formed droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average diameters of generated bubbles were in the range of 362-543 and 492-626 lm, when using the microchannel with main channel width of 0.6 and 0.8 mm, respectively. The polydispersity index of bubble diameters at every operating condition, which is defined as the ratio of the relative deviation of bubble size to the average bubble diameter, was less than 3%, so it indicates the microbubbles are highly uniform (Xu et al 2006a). Flows of both phases were consistent in the two generators for equal-sized bubbles in collision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro bubbles as carriers of pharmacologically active compounds represent one of the most promising frontiers of modern medicine having great potential to revolutionize disease treatment, specifically where the high concentration of drugs administered systematically causes undesirable side effects to the patient. Currently, many researches on this subject are underway, seeking to improve micro bubble production techniques by looking for new biocompatible coating matrices [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and at the same time satisfies the prerequisites of stability and ability to withstand the aggressions of the environment in which they will be dispersed. The feasibility of this new modality of treatment involves the development of techniques of manufacture of generators, accessible and, at the same time, able to generate uniform and stable micro bubbles with sizes compatible with clinical applications, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%