2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0021364008200095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of metastable above-barrier hole states in ZnSe/BeTe type II heterostructures under high-density optical excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When bands are bent, the hole state energy in the ZnSe layer is below the edge of the valence band, so a potential barrier is formed and the hole relaxation from the ZnSe layer to the BeTe layer is dramatically retarded. Further band bending leads to the larger barrier depth and to the decrease of the barrier transparency, so the hole state in the ZnSe layer becomes metastable [4,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When bands are bent, the hole state energy in the ZnSe layer is below the edge of the valence band, so a potential barrier is formed and the hole relaxation from the ZnSe layer to the BeTe layer is dramatically retarded. Further band bending leads to the larger barrier depth and to the decrease of the barrier transparency, so the hole state in the ZnSe layer becomes metastable [4,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work calculations for τ rel and τ rad were performed in the broad range of separated carrier density n (analogous to ones in [3,6]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, the indirect emission line is attributed to the holes scattered from the Zn 1−x Mn x Se into the Be 1−y Mn y Te layers after the photogeneration. This hole relaxation process is fast and depends strongly on the width of the Zn 1−x Mn x Se layer 16,17 . As a result, the relative intensities of the direct and indirect emission lines in the samples #2 and #3 (pay attention to the multiplication factor for the DT line of the sample #3) differ considerably.…”
Section: Magnetization Dynamics In Type-ii Dms Heterostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%