2006
DOI: 10.1134/s0361768806060077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of hypercube representation of relational database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Корректность представления данных достигалась за счет преобразования реляционного представления данных в иерархическое представление. Позднее было предложено обобщение данного подхода [18], в котором корректность достигается за счет зависимостей соединения.…”
Section: связанные работыunclassified
“…Корректность представления данных достигалась за счет преобразования реляционного представления данных в иерархическое представление. Позднее было предложено обобщение данного подхода [18], в котором корректность достигается за счет зависимостей соединения.…”
Section: связанные работыunclassified
“…The authors in [37] presented a study on the design of a decision support system for an aviation engine control system; the results indicate that fact tables do not provide any information on how to group records when calculating the data aggregation, where they adopted the implementation of the hypercube as a separate database to support functional dependency, and multiple elements combined into one using a specially selected function union that provides the most efficient access to data in terms of speed. The researchers in [38] concluded that a joint query would also not produce the desired result, since joint queries must have concurrent schemas (groups of attributes after the SELECT operator); thus, it is necessary to specify all relationships with these attributes in all queries that are standardized. The OLAP hypercube solves this problem automatically without additional user efforts by using a joint query.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%