2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1063773719050013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Hydrogen Emission Lines in the Magnetospheres of Young Stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, our interpretation is that fainter and brighter M magnitudes, which cause the division between blue and red stars in Figs. 1, 3, and 4, correspond to stars with fainter and stronger Hβ emission lines, which in turn are slow and fast rotators (Dmitriev et al 2019). Furthermore, the difference derived between M and T 1 magnitudes of blue and red stars (−0.26 ± 0.07 mag) confirms the correlation found by Fang et al (2018) contribution of Hβ to the M magnitudes explains the eMSTO observed by Piatti & Cole (2017) in the M versus C − M CMD (their Fig.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…At this point, our interpretation is that fainter and brighter M magnitudes, which cause the division between blue and red stars in Figs. 1, 3, and 4, correspond to stars with fainter and stronger Hβ emission lines, which in turn are slow and fast rotators (Dmitriev et al 2019). Furthermore, the difference derived between M and T 1 magnitudes of blue and red stars (−0.26 ± 0.07 mag) confirms the correlation found by Fang et al (2018) contribution of Hβ to the M magnitudes explains the eMSTO observed by Piatti & Cole (2017) in the M versus C − M CMD (their Fig.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…5. The densities indicated by these best fits appear consistent with predictions of accretion stream models (Hartmann et al 1994;Muzerolle et al 2001;Dmitriev et al 2019) and other observational studies that compare hydrogen line strengths to predictions of the Kwan & Fischer (2011) grid to infer densities of accretion columns (e.g., Edwards et al 2013;Rigliaco et al 2015;Antoniucci et al 2017). Taken together, these studies support a picture where the density increases along typical CTTS accretion streams from n H ∼ 10 9.6 (as indicated by the highest-opacity Balmer decrements; Antoniucci et al 2017) to n H ∼ 10 11 (as traced by the higher-opacity Paschen and Pfund lines; Edwards et al 2013;Rigliaco et al 2015;Antoniucci et al 2017), and reach values as high as n H ∼ 10 12 for the densest regions of the most heavily accreting systems, as revealed by the lowestopacity Brackett decrements reported here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“… see their Figure 16). Computational advances have also allowed significantly more complex radiative transfer methods to compute emergent line profiles (see, e.g., Kurosawa et al 2011;Esau et al 2014; Dmitriev et al 2019;Wilson et al 2022), and point to more complex geometries than implied in a simple dipole model (e.g., Romanova et al 2003Romanova et al , 2008Ingleby et al 2013). Nonetheless, the formalism used by Hartmann et al (1994) and Muzerolle et al (2001) appears sufficient to describe the density and temperature structure of the accreting material in even nondipolar flows and provides significant explanatory power for modern observations.…”
Section: Accretion Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models of the disk wind and magnetospheric accretion were used to calculate spectral line profiles (see, e.g., Kurosawa et al, 2011;Dmitriev et al, 2019). A comparison of the calculated profiles with the observed ones allows us to ascertain parameters of models and estimate the mass loss rate.…”
Section: Wind and Circumstellar Dustmentioning
confidence: 99%