2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of fluorine for abating sulfur hexafluoride in an atmospheric-pressure plasma environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the process/equipment and material modifications are not currently practical, add-on-control approaches are the most available and cost-effective methods at present. Several studies have addressed the abatement/destruction methods such as thermal destruction [3], catalytic decomposition [4], plasma abatement [5], electrochemical reduction [6], photodegradation [7,8] and other advanced or combined abatement processes [9]. However, all of these are very costly and by-products emitted from some methods are harmful to human health and the environment [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the process/equipment and material modifications are not currently practical, add-on-control approaches are the most available and cost-effective methods at present. Several studies have addressed the abatement/destruction methods such as thermal destruction [3], catalytic decomposition [4], plasma abatement [5], electrochemical reduction [6], photodegradation [7,8] and other advanced or combined abatement processes [9]. However, all of these are very costly and by-products emitted from some methods are harmful to human health and the environment [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degradation of SF 6 had been achieved utilizing combustion, chemical-thermal catalysis and plasma methods [5][6][7], yet these technologies suffer either from high energy consumption or from the yield of especially toxic byproducts such as SF 4 , SF 2 , S 2 F 10 , SOF 2 , SOF 4 , SOF 10 , SO 2 F 2 , S 2 O 2 F 10 , HF and H 2 S [8,9]. Therefore an economically feasible approach that can eliminate SF 6 molecules effectively and generate less toxic products needs to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the admirable modification effectiveness, the available plasma techniques for surface treatment are mostly restricted to the plasma reactor volume and the vacuum/chemical cycles. To overcome the limitations, atmospheric-pressure plasma technique is the potential candidate for surface modification [8]- [13]. The plasma techniques at atmospheric pressure obtained several benefits such as vacuum free, chamberless surface treatment, and dry process.…”
Section: Surface Characterization Of Argon/methane Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%