2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of electrically conductive hollow fiber membranes via crossflow deposition of carbon nanotubes – Addressing the conductivity/permeability trade-off

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our cost analysis based on the CNT-ECMs used in this study indicates that coating a porous UF polymeric support (PES) with functionalized multi-walled CNTs to a surface coating thickness of 1 μm would cost $2.88/m 2 , equal to 0.4% in total material cost. Manufacturing methods are currently only appropriate for lab-scale development, although recent hollow fiber coating techniques by our lab 81 and others 82 indicate some promise for scalable techniques. Module designs have been proposed but are still lacking.…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our cost analysis based on the CNT-ECMs used in this study indicates that coating a porous UF polymeric support (PES) with functionalized multi-walled CNTs to a surface coating thickness of 1 μm would cost $2.88/m 2 , equal to 0.4% in total material cost. Manufacturing methods are currently only appropriate for lab-scale development, although recent hollow fiber coating techniques by our lab 81 and others 82 indicate some promise for scalable techniques. Module designs have been proposed but are still lacking.…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following procedure is the self-assembly of CNTs, which forms a macrostructure composed of randomly entangled CNTs. This process is typically achieved by evaporation, filtration or crossflow deposition 73 of the CNT dispersion. The resultant CNT membranes typically have a nanometer-thin structure and can also be thick enough to act as a free-standing structure.…”
Section: Cnt-based Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 While some of these methods were successful with some polymeric membranes such as poly(ether sulfone) (PES), 15,16 cellulose nitrate, 7 and poly(ethylene terephthalate), 14 no methods have yet been developed to create stable ECMs on chemically inert poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes. 14,17 Furthermore, some additives and cross-linkers, such as PVA, have been demonstrated to leach from the membrane under concentration polarization, leading to unstable CNT cross-linking and variable surface conductivities. 10 PVDF is one of the most prevalent polymers used to make MF and UF membranes, yet no stable ECMs have been made using PVDF; its thermal stability and chemical inertness limit its surface modification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 PVDF is one of the most prevalent polymers used to make MF and UF membranes, yet no stable ECMs have been made using PVDF; its thermal stability and chemical inertness limit its surface modification. 15,18 There is thus a need to develop effective binding methods to attach conductive materials such as CNTs to polymer supports in general and especially for PVDF-based ECMs. In addition, any developed ECM chemistry must be optimized to maximize its surface conductivity, minimize the permeability loss associated with the coating, and demonstrate physical and chemical stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%