1976
DOI: 10.1080/00337577608243042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of cones during sputtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, while the anomalous sputtering rate practically does not depend on the target temperature, the latter is crucial factor in determination of the texturing degree. Such inhomogeneous structures as those demonstrated in figure 12 and created on the bombarded surfaces under the influence of the ion impacts were observed in plenty of experiments, carried out in other conditions [4,70,100], and cannot be considered as a smoking gun of the anomalous sputtering per se. Indeed, the texture elements of intricate form are the consequence of the surface instability due to massively torn bonds between atoms (ions) near the surface whatever the reason of the damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, while the anomalous sputtering rate practically does not depend on the target temperature, the latter is crucial factor in determination of the texturing degree. Such inhomogeneous structures as those demonstrated in figure 12 and created on the bombarded surfaces under the influence of the ion impacts were observed in plenty of experiments, carried out in other conditions [4,70,100], and cannot be considered as a smoking gun of the anomalous sputtering per se. Indeed, the texture elements of intricate form are the consequence of the surface instability due to massively torn bonds between atoms (ions) near the surface whatever the reason of the damage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…pyramids, cones, and craters. Similar structures grow more slowly under bombardment by ions of E ≈ 20 ÷ 40 keV [4,70].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the analysis depth, D, is considered to be the most inaccurate parameter in this case. In general, the TA-LYSTEP surface profiler is accurate to less than 10% for depth measurements greater than 100 A; however, crater bottom roughness caused by sputtering of polycrystalline samples and additionally by "cone" formation (10) may cause the depth measurement to be inaccurate by as much as 30%.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By way of example, Fig. 8 shows the surface of a single-crystal copper sample (crystallographic plane, 001) after its sputtering by a beam of argon ions with an energy of 40 keV [26]. As the angle of incidence changes, the "cones" are modified, while the erosion remains nonuniform.…”
Section: Surface Effects Sputtering By Charge-exchange Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%