1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)42783-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of collagen fibrils by enzymic cleavage of precursors of type I collagen in vitro.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro fiber formation observed during pN-type I to type I collagen conversion demonstrated a dependence of the rate of fibril formation upon the rate of removal of the aminoterminal peptide, but the final fibril diameter was unaffected. In similar experiments using pC-type I collagen, the fibril formed concurrent with removal of the carboxyl-terminal peptide were of very large diameter (Miyahara et al, 1984). These observations suggest that the amino and carboxyl propeptides of both types I and III collagens may be directly involved in regulating fibril growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vitro fiber formation observed during pN-type I to type I collagen conversion demonstrated a dependence of the rate of fibril formation upon the rate of removal of the aminoterminal peptide, but the final fibril diameter was unaffected. In similar experiments using pC-type I collagen, the fibril formed concurrent with removal of the carboxyl-terminal peptide were of very large diameter (Miyahara et al, 1984). These observations suggest that the amino and carboxyl propeptides of both types I and III collagens may be directly involved in regulating fibril growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A number of regulatory mechanisms have been suggested. These include direct participation by cells in fibrillogenesis (Birk and Trelstad, 1986) as well as the involvement of posttranslational proteolytic processing of type I and III procollagens (Miyahara et al, 1984;Fleischmajer et al, 1985) and possibly type V collagen (Fitch et al, 1984) in the control of this process. The latter postulates are supported by the observations that types I, III, and V collagens share common structural features (Miller, 1985), and that all can form fibrils in vitro with the same periodic D-banding seen in vivo (Adachi and Hayashi, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collagen fibril formation is a complex process that is regulated by a number of different factors, including: the collagen type or types present (2,37), the sequence and extent of propeptide processing (14,15,38), interactions with other matrix components (7,41), as well as a direct involvement of the cells (3,4,45). The collagen composition, distribution of collagen types, and fibril organization are characteristic of different connective tissues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its absence, procollagen intermediates still bearing the N-propeptide are secreted and incorporated into the ECM. Unlike the C-propeptide, retention of the N-propeptide does not preclude fibril formation (Hulmes et al, 1989;Miyahara et al, 1984;Miyahara et al, 1982;Romanic et al, 1992); thus, it is not surprising that collagen fibrils are formed. We also (green) and transiently transfected with mCh-ST (magenta) and an ER RUSH hook.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to fibrillogenesis, the N-and C-propeptide domains of procollagen are cleaved to promote correct alignment and polymerization. Removal of the C-propeptide is particularly critical as this induces self-assembly of collagen into fibrils (Hulmes et al, 1989;Kadler et al, 1987;Kadler et al, 1990;Miyahara et al, 1984;Miyahara et al, 1982). Retention of the N-propeptide, on the other hand, does not preclude fibril assembly but can affect fibril morphology (Bornstein et al, 2002;Hulmes et al, 1989;Romanic et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%