2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of chromitites and ferrogabbros in ultramafic and mafic members of the Variscan Ślęża ophiolite (SW Poland)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of the deposit-type classification scheme of Dupuis and Beaudoin [67] to the examined rocks from Kletno shows that, despite the high Cu content of one hornblendite sample (KL-1 = 173.7 ppm Cu) and magmatic origin of its protolith, the examined prospect does not correspond with the magmatic Ni-Cu massive sulfide deposit-type ( Figure 13A), which is consistent with the low Ni content of hornblendites (62-66 ppm Ni). Magnetite from hornblendites classify it as high temperature magmatic Fe-Ti and V deposits ( Figure 13B,C), similar to the case of the Fe-Ti-V mineralization hosted in the metabasites of theŚlęża Ophiolite [17]. In addition, Fe-Ti-V mineralization hosted in dolomite veins also plots in the field of magmatic Fe-Ti, V deposits ( Figure 13B,C).…”
Section: Mineralization Origin and The Fluid Sourcesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Application of the deposit-type classification scheme of Dupuis and Beaudoin [67] to the examined rocks from Kletno shows that, despite the high Cu content of one hornblendite sample (KL-1 = 173.7 ppm Cu) and magmatic origin of its protolith, the examined prospect does not correspond with the magmatic Ni-Cu massive sulfide deposit-type ( Figure 13A), which is consistent with the low Ni content of hornblendites (62-66 ppm Ni). Magnetite from hornblendites classify it as high temperature magmatic Fe-Ti and V deposits ( Figure 13B,C), similar to the case of the Fe-Ti-V mineralization hosted in the metabasites of theŚlęża Ophiolite [17]. In addition, Fe-Ti-V mineralization hosted in dolomite veins also plots in the field of magmatic Fe-Ti, V deposits ( Figure 13B,C).…”
Section: Mineralization Origin and The Fluid Sourcesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These EDX spectra have characteristic peaks at distinct positions in the keV scale and distinct relative cts/s, allowing identification of the major elements present and providing a semiquantitative indication of their concentrations. The SEM-MLA software (version MLA 3.1 by FEI) recognizes each mineral phase after its EDX spectrum by comparison to a reference set of EDX spectra from identified mineral phases with known compositions [7,8]. The mode of recognition is straightforward for phases larger than several microns, but this is not always the case for the rhyolitic matrix.…”
Section: Mineral Liberation Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated SEM analysis provides precise information on modal compositions, including the identification of many accessory phases [8,9]. However, it is the additional information such as grain size distribution and mineral association that offer better insight into the possible sources of zircon grains.…”
Section: New Insights Into Zircon Behavior In Silicic Magmas Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dates show a relatively large spread of c. 10 Ma and, importantly, the more reliable results come from the biggest Ślęża Massif only; the age of the other component massifs of the CSO is less well constrained. Also, the well-defined mid-ocean-ridge-basalt (MORB) -like affinities of the mafic rocks in the CSO are in contrast with supra-subduction characteristics found in some rodingites, ore bodies and epidosites (Dubińska & Gunia, 1997;Wojtulek et al 2016aWojtulek et al , b, 2017Wojtulek et al , 2019Klukowski, 2017). This raises the question of geotectonic interpretation of the CSO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%