We performed experimental work to determine why anhydrite (CaSO4) forms in flow-through reactors (analogous to flowing groundwater systems), whereas gypsum (CaSO4•2H2O) forms in batch reactors (analogous to closed evaporative basins) [1]. Our work is particularly relevant to sedimentary rocks on Mars where different sulfates, including jarosite (KFe3(OH)6(SO4)2) and Ca-sulfates with varying hydration states, are observed in outcrops at Gale Crater [2][3]. Through experimental work and analysis of experimental samples using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman Spectroscopy, visible/near infrared spectroscopy (VNIR), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we seek to better understand how Ca-sulfate crystals nucleate [4] and grow at low temperatures. This information will inform interpretations of formation conditions of Ca-sulfates on both Mars and Earth.Dixon et al. [1] hypothesized that anhydrite may form at low temperatures in flow-through experiments due to the constant source of high salinity, low-water activity brine, while gypsum initially nucleates in the batch reactors, increasing the activity of water as calcium and sulfate ions are consumed. Other workers have suggested that Ca-sulfate minerals form via complex nucleation, aggregation, and growth processes [4] that may also be affected by hydrologic flow rates, as well as different mineral substrates present in the system. We conducted short-term (22 day), low temperature (20℃) flow-through and batch reactor experiments with different brine concentrations and mineral substrates -CaCl2 brines + jarosite and MgSO4/MgCl2 brines + calcite (CaCO3) -to test Dixon et al.'s hypothesis in addition to the hypothesis that varying the mineral substrate would affect reaction products. We employed XRD to identify the reaction products formed in both flow-through and batch reactor experiments. Due to the relative insensitivity of XRD to poorly crystalline or nanocrystalline phases within the jarosite matrix, we used Raman spectroscopy (785 nm) as an additional analytical technique to identify and map mineral phases present in the samples. We also conducted visible/near-infrared spectroscopy (VNIR: 0.35-2.5 µm) to test the possibility of detecting and resolving Ca-sulfate phases in these samples. Finally, we examined the textural relationships in the reaction products using TEM to evaluate possible nucleation pathways leading to anhydrite precipitation in flowing brines.We identified mineral phases present in experimental samples using XRD and Raman spectroscopy. In the jarosite + CaCl2 brine experiments, akaganeite (FeO(OH, Cl)) is observed as a reaction product across batch and flow-through experiments (Fig. 1c). Antarcticite (CaCl2•6H2O) is also observed in most experiments, but is present in reaction product specimens due to precipitation of residual brine in the samples and was likely not present in the dissolution reactors. Gypsum is present across all experiments. Bassanite (CaSO₄·0.5H2O) may be present in trace amounts (<1 wt. %) in two flow-through experiments,...