2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of calcite in the presence of dissolved organic matter: Partitioning, fabrics and fluorescence

Abstract: Dissolved organic matter (DOM) is omnipresent in natural waters and is commonly incorporated into carbonates. Records of DOM from speleothems (secondary carbonates found in caves) have often been interpreted to reflect groundwater DOM concentrations.However, the fidelity of these records is largely untested. An understanding of the relationship between dripwater and speleothem DOM is thus required to allow speleothems to be reliably used as archives of DOM concentration.We precipitated calcite (CaCO3) crystals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in good agreement with both our canonical understanding of the spectral characteristics of terrigenous HULIS in aquatic environments (Coble 2007), and also with the previous coral fluorescence study by (Matthews et al 1996). The linear concentration dependence of the HULIS fluorescence intensity and the lack of pH sensitivity between pH 2 and 7 are both consistent with prior studies of terrestrial HULIS fluorescence in water samples, in abiogenic calcite (Pearson et al 2020) and in coral skeleton (Matthews et al 1996). Unlike Matthews et al (1996), the samples in this study were dissolved and measured directly without first extracting the organic matter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in good agreement with both our canonical understanding of the spectral characteristics of terrigenous HULIS in aquatic environments (Coble 2007), and also with the previous coral fluorescence study by (Matthews et al 1996). The linear concentration dependence of the HULIS fluorescence intensity and the lack of pH sensitivity between pH 2 and 7 are both consistent with prior studies of terrestrial HULIS fluorescence in water samples, in abiogenic calcite (Pearson et al 2020) and in coral skeleton (Matthews et al 1996). Unlike Matthews et al (1996), the samples in this study were dissolved and measured directly without first extracting the organic matter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, extractions also subject the organic matter to more extreme changes in solution pH. Pearson et al (2020) examined the incorporation of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from groundwater into stalagmites in caves, using a similar technique to ours: they precipitated abiogenic CaCO 3 from water samples that were amended with peatland DOM, and measured fluorescence EEM spectra after dissolving the CaCO 3 samples. Their findings with calcite precipitation are similar to our results with aragonite-the fluorescence signal in the precipitated CaCO 3 was dominated by the humic-like Peak C (ex/em 330-350/420-480 nm (Coble 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nettlebed cave speleothem trace element chemistry, ultraviolet luminescence intensity (UVL), and Uranium isotopic data support the interpretation of δ 13 C as a palaeohydrology proxy. Millennial-scale UVL variations closely mimic coeval δ 13 C patterns and have been hypothetically linked to seepage water organic acid content flux that impacts speleothem fluid inclusion density, an assertion now supported by experimental evidence [149]. In this situation, increased (or decreased) speleothem growth rates that contribute to calcite formation should align to increases (or decreases) in percolation water flow rates, elevated (or reduced) biological activity in and above the epikarst, and warmer (or cooler) temperatures.…”
Section: Appendix B2 δ 13 C In New Zealand Speleothemsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The measurement parameters for 3D‐EEM were set to a 1.0 s integration time, a measurement range of 240–600 nm excitation wavelength with a step‐size of 3 nm, and a 246–824 nm emission wavelength with a defaulted step‐size. To eliminate instrument‐specific biases, each matrix was corrected for inner‐filter effects, and scatter lines were Rayleigh masked using Aqualog's in‐situ data processing software and protocols (Pearson et al, 2020). Because of the difference in the spectrometers between the two‐stage experiments, the spectra were normalized to the corresponding mean Raman unit (RU) of distilled deionized water with the integration intensity of the Raman peak range of 371–428 nm emission at 350 nm excitation to ensure unit uniformity (Lawaetz & Stedmon, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%