2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of Ag2, Au2 and AgAu particles on MgO(100): DFT study on the role of support-induced charge transfer in metal–metal interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The defective oxygen sites on the MgO surface affect the deposition of metal nanoparticles or clusters and, in turn, control the properties of the resultant catalysts. [361][362][363][364] For example, oxygen vacancies in the (100) facet of MgO anchored and activated single Pd atoms via an electron transfer between the metal and support. 362 The Pd 1 /MgO sample effectively catalysed the cyclotrimerisation of acetylene to benzene even at room temperature.…”
Section: Mgo-supported Gold Nanoparticles/clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defective oxygen sites on the MgO surface affect the deposition of metal nanoparticles or clusters and, in turn, control the properties of the resultant catalysts. [361][362][363][364] For example, oxygen vacancies in the (100) facet of MgO anchored and activated single Pd atoms via an electron transfer between the metal and support. 362 The Pd 1 /MgO sample effectively catalysed the cyclotrimerisation of acetylene to benzene even at room temperature.…”
Section: Mgo-supported Gold Nanoparticles/clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Au + surface supports the generation and stabilization of Ag 2 and Ag 3 clusters in the present case. A comparable binding energy of Ag–Ag and Ag–Au may also be a factor for the long-term stability of fluorescent Ag 2 clusters on the Au I surface with partial charge transfer . The core–shell particle is further stabilized by GSH in solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all DFT models in this work and previous work 120−122 agree that the lowest energy structure of a coinage metal dimer is in the vertical position on top of the O atom (i.e., OV in Figure 1b), there have been large noted discrepancies in the strength of this binding relative to different configurations. 122 For the same set of DFT models as the metal−metal interactions, we have assessed the performance for metal−support interactions (i.e., the binding energy of various dimer configurations) in Figure 2b. Notably, we observe a wider range of errors in metal−support interactions, starting from as small as 36 meV to as high as have compared a large set of dispersion corrections (in Figure 2c) to the PBE functional and found that TS/HI was the best performing across all 8 dimer configurations (i.e., binding sites).…”
Section: Dispersion Corrections (Discussed In Ref 117)mentioning
confidence: 99%