2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation of a dynamic membrane altered the microbial community and metabolic flux in fermentative hydrogen production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, Propionibacteriaceae can ferment carbohydrates and produce propionic acid, acetic acid or a mixture compound of organic acids including butyric acid, formic acid, and lactic acid. Sporolactobacillaceae is involved in metabolic pathways of acetic acid and lactic acid ( Park et al, 2019 ). Short-chain fatty acids act as energy source of intestinal epithelial cells ( Donohoe et al, 2011 ), which can promote the development of intestinal villi, regulate intestinal morphology, and structure of broilers ( Shakouri et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Propionibacteriaceae can ferment carbohydrates and produce propionic acid, acetic acid or a mixture compound of organic acids including butyric acid, formic acid, and lactic acid. Sporolactobacillaceae is involved in metabolic pathways of acetic acid and lactic acid ( Park et al, 2019 ). Short-chain fatty acids act as energy source of intestinal epithelial cells ( Donohoe et al, 2011 ), which can promote the development of intestinal villi, regulate intestinal morphology, and structure of broilers ( Shakouri et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because bacteria are sensitive to pH changes in their environment, and even minor changes in pH can trigger changes in microbial metabolism. Because microorganisms are most active in nearneutral environments (Pawar et al, 2022).…”
Section: Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different reactors have been reported in the literature, including anaerobic packed-bed reactor (AnPBR), anaerobic structured-bed reactor (AnSTBR), anaerobic fluidized-bed reactor (AnFBR), expanded granular sludge bed reactor (EGSB), up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB), anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (AnSBR), continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) [10], and, more recently, dynamic membrane reactors (DMBR) [11,12]. Among them, the CSTR is perhaps the most widely used reactor configuration to produce biohydrogen via DF due to easy operation and control, as well as owing to its flexibility to operate under suspended and attached biomass configurations; however, DMBRs have sustained very high hydrogen productivities using model substrates [11,13,14], and even more complex ones such as algal biomass [12]. Last but not least, the type of inoculum used, as well as its pretreatment method, are also major factors influencing the DF process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%