1990
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.42.11743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation mechanisms of localized interstitial states in tetrahedrally bonded semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An isolated P Ga antisite in its singly positive charge state was previously identified by electron paramagnetic resonance ͑EPR͒, characterized by an isotropic and strong HF interaction between the unpaired electron and a 31 P nucleus. [17][18][19][20] This interpretation of the early EPR results has been supported by several theoretical studies where an s-like deep-level state is expected for an isolated P Ga 1+ antisite, [20][21][22] which warrants the observed isotropic and strong HF interaction. In contrast, a p-like state was theoretically predicted for a P i interstitial.…”
Section: B Defect Configurationsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An isolated P Ga antisite in its singly positive charge state was previously identified by electron paramagnetic resonance ͑EPR͒, characterized by an isotropic and strong HF interaction between the unpaired electron and a 31 P nucleus. [17][18][19][20] This interpretation of the early EPR results has been supported by several theoretical studies where an s-like deep-level state is expected for an isolated P Ga 1+ antisite, [20][21][22] which warrants the observed isotropic and strong HF interaction. In contrast, a p-like state was theoretically predicted for a P i interstitial.…”
Section: B Defect Configurationsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In contrast, a p-like state was theoretically predicted for a P i interstitial. 20,21 Following the same line of arguments, many defects with a sizable HF interaction involving a central 31 P atom, commonly occurring in bulk GaP grown by liquid-encapsulated Czochralski, have been interpreted to involve P Ga ͑and not P i ͒ based on a strong s-like character of the wave function and its strong localization at the 31 P atom. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] These assignments have received further support from theoretical prediction that defect formation energy during equilibrium growth greatly favors formation of antisites.…”
Section: B Defect Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also have to mention that, due to partial occupation of the t 2 -level, H Cd can undergo Jahn-Teller distortion. This would result in the splitting of the t 2 -level into an occupied e-level and a half-filled a 1 -level, 41 along with a symmetry-lowering atomic relaxation. Our present electronic structure calculations, however, do not show either the splitting of the t 2 -level or the symmetry-lowering atomic distortion.…”
Section: Substitutional Hydrogen In Cdtementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second pair, derived mostly from the H orbitals, lies above the VBM. 41 The electron of the H atom is accommodated by the a 1 -state in the band gap. The position of this state depends on the potential of the defect center; for example, it has been found in the case of Cd and Te interstitial impurities at the tetrahedral site that the a 1 -state is located closer to the CBM and below the VBM, respectively.…”
Section: Interstitial Hydrogen In Cdte: Tetrahedral T CD and T Te Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%