2010
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201000656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and Rearrangement of SnII Phosphanediide Cages

Abstract: The room-temperature reactions of Sn(NMe(2))(2) with less sterically demanding primary phosphines (RPH(2)) give the homoleptic phosphanediide compounds [SnPR](n) in high yields (R=tBu (1a), cyclohexyl (1b), 1-adamantyl (1c)). However, the room-temperature reaction of Mes*PH(2) (Mes*=2,4,6-tBu(3)C(6)H(2)) with Sn(NMe(2))(2) gives the model intermediate [{SnPMes*}(2)(mu-NMe(2))SnP(H)Mes*] (3), together with the product of complete deprotonation [SnPMes*](3) (4). Phosphorus--phosphorus bonded products are produce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of steric protection was also applied by Wright et al and Power et al in the related tin(II) phosphinidenes/phosphanediide [SnPR] n [R = t Bu, cyclohexyl, 1‐adamantyl, 2,4,6‐ t Bu 3 C 6 H 2 , C 6 H 3 ‐2,6‐(C 6 H 3 ‐2,4,6‐ i Pr 2 ) 2 ] 7. These compounds, containing a P–Sn multiple bond or a highly polarized P–Sn single bond, are supposed to be efficient in the P–P dehydrocoupling reactions,7g,8 similarly to the transition‐metal relatives 9. This was further corroborated when tin(II) phosphanediides were heated producing phosphorus–phosphorus‐bonded products 8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of steric protection was also applied by Wright et al and Power et al in the related tin(II) phosphinidenes/phosphanediide [SnPR] n [R = t Bu, cyclohexyl, 1‐adamantyl, 2,4,6‐ t Bu 3 C 6 H 2 , C 6 H 3 ‐2,6‐(C 6 H 3 ‐2,4,6‐ i Pr 2 ) 2 ] 7. These compounds, containing a P–Sn multiple bond or a highly polarized P–Sn single bond, are supposed to be efficient in the P–P dehydrocoupling reactions,7g,8 similarly to the transition‐metal relatives 9. This was further corroborated when tin(II) phosphanediides were heated producing phosphorus–phosphorus‐bonded products 8…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tin–tin distances are between 2.8239(7) Å and 2.8867(8) Å and lie in the range of those found in [Sn 8 (PSi i Pr 3 ) 6 Cl 2 ]7 [2.834(1)–2.888(2) Å] or in grey tin (2.80 Å). Moreover, the Sn–P bond lengths in 2 [2.506(2)–2.689(2) Å] are similar to those in [Sn 8 (PSi i Pr 3 ) 6 Cl 2 ] [2.538(5)–2.728(5) Å]7 and [Sn 7 ( t BuP) 7 ]12 [2.573(5)–2.670(5) Å]. Interestingly, the P–Sn–P as well as the Sn–P–Sn angles in both Sn 2 P 2 four‐membered rings of 2 are relatively close to 90°, while the P–Sn–P and the Sn–P–Sn angles in the rest of the molecule show quite different values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This heptameric structural motive is also observed in the aluminium‐phosphorus compound [MeAlPSiMe 2 Thex] 7 (Thex = thexyl, –CMe 2 i Pr)13 and in the tin compounds [Sn 7 (PSi i Pr 3 ) 7 ]7 and [Sn 7 (PR) 7 ] (R = t Bu, cyclohexyl, 1‐adamantyl) 12. The Pb–P distances in the upper six‐membered ring capped by lead are shorter [2.670(3)–2.682(3) Å] than the ones in the lower six‐membered ring capped by a phosphorus atom [2.701(2)–2.735(2) Å].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations