2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0274-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and growth of sub-3-nm aerosol particles in experimental chambers

Abstract: Atmospheric new particle formation (NPF), which is observed in many environments globally, is an important source of boundary-layer aerosol particles and cloud condensation nuclei, which affect both the climate and human health. To better understand the mechanisms behind NPF, chamber experiments can be used to simulate this phenomenon under wellcontrolled conditions. Recent advancements in instrumentation have made it possible to directly detect the first steps of NPF of molecular clusters (~1-2 nm in diameter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 219 publications
(236 reference statements)
1
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This characteristic is consistent with observations of new particle formation (Riccobono et al, 2014;Dada et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This characteristic is consistent with observations of new particle formation (Riccobono et al, 2014;Dada et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The simulation of nucleation to produce newly-formed suspended particles is one of the most active areas of ongoing atmospheric research and many important advances in observing the nucleation process have been, and will continue to be, made through appropriate measurements in chamber experiments and their interpretation (Dada et al, 2020). PyCHAM is not intended to interpret and examine chamber experiments designed to resolve the mechanisms involved in molecular clustering,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to very low particle concentrations in the chamber, the data are close to the lower detection limit of the measurable formation rates. Both factors lead to a higher uncertainty in the nucleation rate calculation (Dada et al, 2020).…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature On Pure Biogenic Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research dealing with NPF event analysis has used similar methodology as outlined in the 'protocol' described by Kulmala et al (2012); Dada et al (2020). Particle formation rates, at the detection limit of the instrument (typically in the range 2-3 nm), are usually estimated from the time evolution of either the total number concentration or the number concentration below a certain size (for example 20 nm), correcting for coagulation loss and condensation growth with very simple and approximate balance equations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods 1 and 2 are applicable to cases, in which there is a clear nucleation mode growing, as is the case, for example, for the multitude of events analyzed from the Hyytiälä forest station in Finland Maso et al (2005). For chamber experiments, where the aerosol size distribution approaches steady state Dada et al (2020), these two approaches cannot be used. Method 3 can then be applied to the transition stage of the dynamics, before steady-state is reached.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%