2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13915.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and dynamical evolution of multiple stellar generations in globular clusters

Abstract: We study the formation and dynamical evolution of clusters with multiple stellar generations. Observational studies have found that some globular clusters host a population of second generation (SG) stars which show chemical anomalies and must have formed from gas containing matter processed in the envelopes of first generation (FG) cluster stars. We study the SG formation process by means of one‐dimensional (1D) hydrodynamical simulations, starting from a FG already in place and assuming that the SG is formed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
657
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 632 publications
(684 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
(195 reference statements)
24
657
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Longmore et al 2014). Globular clusters, on the other hand, host chemical abundance anomalies within their stellar populations (e.g., Gratton et al 2012), and while age spreads cannot be discerned at these old ages, some scenarios to explain the anomalies invoke multiple star-forming epochs, spanning tens to hundreds of Myr (e.g., D'Ercole et al 2008;Conroy & Spergel 2011), although other scenarios have little or no age spreads (e.g., Krause et al 2013;Bastian et al 2013b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longmore et al 2014). Globular clusters, on the other hand, host chemical abundance anomalies within their stellar populations (e.g., Gratton et al 2012), and while age spreads cannot be discerned at these old ages, some scenarios to explain the anomalies invoke multiple star-forming epochs, spanning tens to hundreds of Myr (e.g., D'Ercole et al 2008;Conroy & Spergel 2011), although other scenarios have little or no age spreads (e.g., Krause et al 2013;Bastian et al 2013b). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it may be possible to constrain these models via their effects on the radial distribution of polluted stars, i.e, the first and later generations. In general, E-mail: Joachimvanderbeke@gmail.com we expect that more enriched stars will tend to reside closer to the cluster centres, as the gas needed to fuel star formation tends to sink to the cluster core (e.g., D'Ercole et al 2008). In the early disk accretion model, the protostellar disks accrete material as they travel through the cluster and therefore one expects a somewhat broader distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this general framework, four main scenarios have been proposed, differing mainly in the nature of the polluters: (i) asymptotic giant branch stars (D'Ercole et al 2008), (ii) fastrotating massive stars (Decressin et al 2007), (iii) interacting massive binary stars (De Mink et al 2009), and (iv) supermassive stars (Denissenkov & Hartwick 2014;Denissenkov et al 2015). An alternative scenario that does not require an age difference between first-and secondgeneration stars is the so-called early disk accretion scenario (Bastian et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%