2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7765(99)00141-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formation and characteristics of nitrifying biofilm on a membrane modified with positively-charged polymer chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Terada et al [163] first added negatively charged glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) chains to PE sheets by RIGP and subsequently converted the chains into positively charged diethylamino (DEA) groups by an epoxy-ringopening reaction. Nitrifying bacteria, which have difficulty forming biofilm due to their poor EPS production, successfully formed a biofilm on the DEA-modified PE surface [164,165]. The initial adhesion rate and the amount of bacteria adhered to the DEA-modified surface were 6-10-fold and 3-fold larger, respectively, than those of the original PE surface.…”
Section: Surface Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Terada et al [163] first added negatively charged glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) chains to PE sheets by RIGP and subsequently converted the chains into positively charged diethylamino (DEA) groups by an epoxy-ringopening reaction. Nitrifying bacteria, which have difficulty forming biofilm due to their poor EPS production, successfully formed a biofilm on the DEA-modified PE surface [164,165]. The initial adhesion rate and the amount of bacteria adhered to the DEA-modified surface were 6-10-fold and 3-fold larger, respectively, than those of the original PE surface.…”
Section: Surface Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Gottenbos et al (2001) showed that bacterial adhesion to a surface with positive zeta potential is enhanced; however, subsequent biofilm formation is slower, indicating that a positively charged surface adversely affects biofilm formation. On the other hand, Hibiya et al (2000) reported that a nitrifying biofilm, which is difficult to obtain, forms on DEAcontaining sheets successfully under high hydrodynamic conditions. This apparent conflict may be due to the fact that different surface properties, bacterial concentrations and hydrodynamic conditions were used in these studies, and hence it is difficult to systematically summarize the crucial factors in biofilm formation.…”
Section: Effect Of Graft Chain On Bacterial Cell Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it has been reported that physico-chemical properties, e.g. surface potential, roughness and hydrophobicity, affect the rate of the initial bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation (Gottenbos et al, 1999(Gottenbos et al, , 2000(Gottenbos et al, , 2001Hibiya et al, 2000;Terada et al, 2005). In view of this link, elucidation of details of the mechanism of initial biofilm formation would be useful for understanding techniques to inhibit or promote the formation of biofilms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that physico-chemical properties, e.g. surface potential, roughness and hydrophobicity, affect the rate of the initial bacterial adhesion [17][18][19][20]. Hydrophilic materials are described to be more resistant to bacterial adhesion than hydrophobic materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%