Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have demonstrated significant development by attaining 25% power conversion efficiencies (PCEs), competing with silicon-based solar cells. [1][2][3][4] The outstanding performance primarily results from the intrinsic superiority of the optoelectronic properties of 3D structures comprising the ABX 3 structure. Early-stage perovskite (PVK) studies have focused on high-quality PVK layers due to inhomogeneous and nonuniform PVK films fabricated using a solution process. [5] A variety of methodologies, such as additive engineering, twostep spin-coating, and anti-solvent methods, have been suggested, some of which result in extremely uniform PVK films without defects. [6][7][8][9] The high quality of these PVK films is mainly attributed to optimized light management, which results in an increase in the short-circuit current density ( J SC ) owing to enhanced light absorption. Fueled by these accomplishments, the photocurrents generated in PSCs have almost approached the Shockley-Queisser limits. [10][11][12] To achieve further enhancement in performance, research has shifted from light management to carrier management to increase the PCEs of PSCs. [13][14][15] The highest efficiency reported recently was realized by a defect-less high-quality electron transport layer (ETL) in PSCs, which led to a high open-circuit voltage (V OC ) while maintaining superior light absorption. [16] Additionally, most leading PSCs have adopted passivation layers at the PVK/hole transport layer (HTL) interface. [17][18][19][20][21] These techniques focus on layers adjacent to the PVKs, and are categorized into carrier management engineering. [22][23][24] Recently, materials that easily form 2D PVKs, such as phenethylamine halides (PEAX), have drawn attention as alternatives to the preexisting passivation layers. [25][26][27] The common phenomenon reported by the incorporation of these layers on top of PVKs is high V OC and fill factor (FF), in addition to relatively high air and electrical stability. [28,29] The strong interaction of the passivation layers with the PVKs has received the most focus in current studies. [30] As the term passivation layers literally mean protection, improvement in the stability of PSCs is often accompanied by the introduction of PEAX. [31] However, the stability issues associated with PEAX were often observed in our experiments, showing that the PCEs of PSCs were easily degraded by aging or heat when PEAX was inserted at the PVK/2,2 0 ,7,7 0 -tetrakis[N,N-di(4-methoxyphenyl)amino]-9,9 0 -spirobifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD) interface, although the initial performance of PSCs with PEAX was high. Jiang et al., who reported the efficacy of PEAI (I: iodide) in PSCs for the first time, also observed an abrupt decrease in PCE when the samples were thermally treated, in accordance with our results. [32] The adverse effects of PEAX were also pronounced in the inverted structures. [26,27,33] The exact mechanism underlying the degradation associated with PEAX has not been ...