2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formalizing and validating the web quality model for web source quality evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hasan and Abuelrub (2011) proposed a model with four dimensions: content, design, organization, and user-friendly. Other similar proposals are those by Fogli and Guida (2015), Rafique, Lew, Abbasi, and Li (2012), Sassano, Olsina, and Mich (2010), and Zhao and Zhu (2014). As can be seen, web quality is a complex concept, and although its measurement is multidimensional, all the authors consider that web content is a critical part of it.…”
Section: Web Content and Its Measurementmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hasan and Abuelrub (2011) proposed a model with four dimensions: content, design, organization, and user-friendly. Other similar proposals are those by Fogli and Guida (2015), Rafique, Lew, Abbasi, and Li (2012), Sassano, Olsina, and Mich (2010), and Zhao and Zhu (2014). As can be seen, web quality is a complex concept, and although its measurement is multidimensional, all the authors consider that web content is a critical part of it.…”
Section: Web Content and Its Measurementmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The principal goal of SEM is to develop models to evaluate and represent the underlying causal processes (Li et al, 2018;Ma et al, 2022). So, the measurement model and structural model can be constructed based on the relationships between variables (Fox, 2006;Zhao and Zhu, 2014;Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Model Structure and Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several authors have studied the quality features of CCA [6,8,[40][41][42][43]. Hence, in order to define a baseline for the CCA quality scheme, a set of twelve properties was selected: reusability, availability, scalability, service customizability, functional feature commonality, nonfunctional feature commonality, infrastructure utilization, invocation time, service stability, service accuracy, resource coverage and robustness of service.…”
Section: Quality Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%