Formalism in online education

Abstract

PurposeWith the rapid transition of education from the traditional, classroom- or campus-based to the online format, there grows a need for not only taking advantage of online technology but also assessing actual and potential effects it can make on the learners, learning, education, and society. One of the risks inherent in online learning is its growing formalization both in the organization of the learning and in its process, which may gravely affect students’ learning, health, cognition, behavior and quality of the learning outcomes. It can also produce serious implications for the society. This article investigates the origins of formalization, its forms and stages, and discusses asynchronous, precision, and automated learning formats from this perspective. Among many issues, the impact of formalization on the learner's development and socialization is considered. The author offers a pragmatic solution for deformalization of online learning.Design/methodology/approachQualitative analysis of contemporary research literature, educational trends and practices.FindingsIt was found that formalism permeates online education in many ways. It is present in asynchronous, precise and automated learning and may produce significant impact on students, their learning, and society.Research limitations/implicationsThis is a qualitative research based on the analysis of current research literature and teaching practices.Practical implicationsWhile formalism in education is an unavoidable evil, its impact must be diminished. Critical analysis and practical recommendations offered may help improve online teaching and learning.Social implicationsFormalism affects both students' socialization in the online learning environment, and patterns of socialization in the society. It also impacts students’ cognition and behaviors. So, counteracting formalism may benefit the society's well-being.Originality/valueThe authors could not find any publications on this topic. So this is an original material which may contribute to improving online teaching and learning.

Experiential learning during lockdown: a teaching case describing intercultural competency development through the mechanism of reflection using different digital teaching methods

“…Digital technologies, which enable students to learn independent of time and space, provide learners with flexibility and the realization of their own individual learning paths and learning outcomes (Howarth et al , 2016). These advantages are counterbalanced by challenges, such as the necessity of learning more autonomously and more self-actively than in traditional face-to-face settings (Serdyukov and Hill, 2013). When it comes to the overall efficiency and outcome of online courses (e.g.…”

The Effectiveness of the Functional Training for Pharmacy and Food Junior Expert Supervisors during Pandemic with Blended Learning Methods

“…In addition, it is important to perform innovation in learning so that later they will be able to compete internationally by paying attention to various strengths, both inside and outside technology. In this situation, it is not easy to assume everything is easy because it takes people who are creative (Serdyukov, P. and Hill, 2013). 2) Effectiveness of facilities so that they can increase interaction/discussion between participants and teaching staff.…”

Online learning in the time of the COVID-19 crisis: Implications for the self-regulated learning of university design students

“…Moreover, in order to have a successful online learning experience, it is necessary that the students retain self-regulation and an active learning attitude in the learning process (Wang et al, 2013). Students need to be more independent in learning since the essence of online learning is to promote self-directed learning (Serdyukov and Hill, 2013). Hence, in comparison with conventional education, students in online education need to possess self-ability to control, manage, and plan their learning behaviors; this learning process is the so-called self-regulated learning (Zimmerman, 2008).…”